Find Mobius Transformations (M→N)

  • Thread starter Thread starter tazzzdo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transformations
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding Mobius transformations that map specific sets of points in the upper-half plane model of hyperbolic space. The sets M and N consist of various points, and the task is to determine the transformations that can connect these sets.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the possibility of developing equations for transformations m(z) and n(z) that map the sets M and N to a common set. There is confusion regarding the choice of points for the transformations and the order in which to map them. Some participants express difficulty in manipulating the equations into a usable form for composition.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different approaches to find the transformations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the mapping of points, but there is still uncertainty about the specifics of the transformations and how to proceed with the composition.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of the problem statement, which specifies the sets M and N. There is a noted confusion about the order of mapping and the implications of using certain points in the transformations.

tazzzdo
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



H is the upper-half plane model of the hyperbolic space

Find all Mobius transformations that send M to N.

Homework Equations



a) M = {0, 1, ∞}, N = {∞, 0, 1}
b) M = {0, 1, ∞}, N = {0, ∞, 2}
c) M = {i, -i, 3i}, N = {∞, i + 1, 6}


The Attempt at a Solution



Using the transformation:

5e40aaf0700c2d00dc6d5d089cba2749.png


Could I develop two equations m(z) and n(z) that map M and N to {0, 1, ∞}, respectively? Then just find n-1[itex]\circ[/itex]m? Wouldn't that result in M→N?

If that's true, I'm just confused as to what points to use for z1, z2, z3.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That works. Your transformation f1(z) takes z1->0, z2->1 and z3->∞. Which case of finding a specific transformation m(z) or n(z) are you confused about? Are you supposed to map the sets in the given order or in any order?
 
Last edited:
Well if I plug those z's in, I get z(-∞)/(z-∞) for m(z). I seem to hit a wall there. Same with n(z). I don't know how to fix those equations into a form that I can use for the composition.
 
tazzzdo said:
Well if I plug those z's in, I get z(-∞)/(z-∞) for m(z). I seem to hit a wall there. Same with n(z). I don't know how to fix those equations into a form that I can use for the composition.

Which part are you working on? I suspect it's trying to map {0,1,∞} to {0,1,∞}. If z is finite then (-∞)/(z-∞) should cancel to 1. That would mean m(z)=z should work. It does, doesn't it?
 
Yeah I see what you're saying. Then does that mean I just switch the z's around in (a) for n(z)? But use the same transformation?
 
I can't find a transformation n such that n(1) = infinity
 
tazzzdo said:
I can't find a transformation n such that n(1) = infinity

Why not? Find it the same way you found m(z). What do you get when you put the z1, z2, z3 in?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K