Find speed of the racing car as it crosses finish line - Mechanics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a mechanics problem related to the speed of a racing car as it crosses the finish line. Participants share their methods for deriving the equation for distance, speed, and acceleration. One user successfully calculates the final speed of the car as 65 m/s using a specific equation. Others discuss the derivation of key equations and the importance of understanding the relationships between distance, initial speed, final speed, and acceleration. The conversation highlights different approaches to solving the same problem, emphasizing the value of diverse mathematical strategies.
chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,825
Reaction score
413
Homework Statement
See attached ( reference is example 1.4.1)
Relevant Equations
##s=ut##
This is a textbook problem (Mechanics).
Attached find the question and respective solution.

1639378575456.png


1639378632124.png


This is fine with me, i like trying different ways of solving math related problems. My approach is as shown below.

Using the graph sketch

1639378725500.png


It follows that,
##s##= ##(35×12)##+##\frac {1}{2}##×##12(v_2 -35)##
##600= 420+6(v_2-35)##
##600 = 420 + 6v_2-210##
##600 = 210 + 6v_2##
##390 = 6v_2##
→##v_2 = 65## m/s bingo

Any other approach will be appreciated...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
chwala said:
It follows that,
##s##= ##(35×12)##+##\frac {1}{2}##×##12(v_2 -35)##
...
Any other approach will be appreciated...

You have of course noticed that you are solving the exact same equation...

For those of us for whom it is a sport to memorize a minimum of stuff, the ##s = {1\over 2} (u+v) t## requires derivation, which is work. Remembering ##s = v_0t+\frac 1 2 at^2 ## is somehow burnt into our brain and then it becomes a two step process:$$600 \ {\mathsf m} = 35*12 \ {\mathsf m} + \frac 1 2 at^2 \quad\Rightarrow\quad a = \frac {360} {144}$$ $$u = v_0 + at \quad\Rightarrow\quad u = 35 \ {\mathsf m/s} + \frac {360} {12} \ {\mathsf m/s} $$
And here we are ##-## of course ##-## solving the same equation, whether this is actually an other approach is a matter of taste...

##\ ##
 
nice ...yes its true that one has to get the derived term i.e ##s##=##\frac {1}{2}####(u+v)t## from
##s##= ##ut##+##\frac {1}{2}####at^2##...(1)
and ##v=u +at##, .....(2)
from (2)
##→at=v-u##
##→a##=##(\frac {v-u}{t})##...(3)
Now, substituting (3) into (1) we get,
##s##= ##ut##+##\frac {1}{2}####(\frac {v-u}{t})####t^2##
##s##= ##ut##+##\frac {vt^2-ut^2}{2t}##
##s##= ##\frac {2t^2u+vt^2-ut^2}{2t}##
##s##= ##\frac {ut^2+vt^2}{2t}##
##s##=##\frac {t}{t}##× ##(\frac {ut+vt}{2})##
##→s##=##\frac {1}{2}####(u+v)t## as required in the problem...
 
Last edited:
Back
Top