Find speed of the racing car as it crosses finish line - Mechanics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on calculating the speed of a racing car as it crosses the finish line using mechanics principles. The solution involves the equation for displacement, specifically s = ut + (1/2)at², and the derived formula s = (1/2)(u + v)t. The final speed calculated is 65 m/s. Various approaches to solving the problem are discussed, emphasizing the importance of understanding the derivation of these equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations in mechanics
  • Familiarity with the concepts of displacement, velocity, and acceleration
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
  • Basic knowledge of graph sketching in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of kinematic equations in detail
  • Explore advanced applications of the equations of motion in real-world scenarios
  • Learn about graphing techniques for motion analysis
  • Investigate the impact of acceleration on final velocity in different contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, mechanics enthusiasts, and anyone interested in solving motion-related problems in a structured manner.

chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,828
Reaction score
420
Homework Statement
See attached ( reference is example 1.4.1)
Relevant Equations
##s=ut##
This is a textbook problem (Mechanics).
Attached find the question and respective solution.

1639378575456.png


1639378632124.png


This is fine with me, i like trying different ways of solving math related problems. My approach is as shown below.

Using the graph sketch

1639378725500.png


It follows that,
##s##= ##(35×12)##+##\frac {1}{2}##×##12(v_2 -35)##
##600= 420+6(v_2-35)##
##600 = 420 + 6v_2-210##
##600 = 210 + 6v_2##
##390 = 6v_2##
→##v_2 = 65## m/s bingo

Any other approach will be appreciated...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
chwala said:
It follows that,
##s##= ##(35×12)##+##\frac {1}{2}##×##12(v_2 -35)##
...
Any other approach will be appreciated...

You have of course noticed that you are solving the exact same equation...

For those of us for whom it is a sport to memorize a minimum of stuff, the ##s = {1\over 2} (u+v) t## requires derivation, which is work. Remembering ##s = v_0t+\frac 1 2 at^2 ## is somehow burnt into our brain and then it becomes a two step process:$$600 \ {\mathsf m} = 35*12 \ {\mathsf m} + \frac 1 2 at^2 \quad\Rightarrow\quad a = \frac {360} {144}$$ $$u = v_0 + at \quad\Rightarrow\quad u = 35 \ {\mathsf m/s} + \frac {360} {12} \ {\mathsf m/s} $$
And here we are ##-## of course ##-## solving the same equation, whether this is actually an other approach is a matter of taste...

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chwala
nice ...yes its true that one has to get the derived term i.e ##s##=##\frac {1}{2}####(u+v)t## from
##s##= ##ut##+##\frac {1}{2}####at^2##...(1)
and ##v=u +at##, .....(2)
from (2)
##→at=v-u##
##→a##=##(\frac {v-u}{t})##...(3)
Now, substituting (3) into (1) we get,
##s##= ##ut##+##\frac {1}{2}####(\frac {v-u}{t})####t^2##
##s##= ##ut##+##\frac {vt^2-ut^2}{2t}##
##s##= ##\frac {2t^2u+vt^2-ut^2}{2t}##
##s##= ##\frac {ut^2+vt^2}{2t}##
##s##=##\frac {t}{t}##× ##(\frac {ut+vt}{2})##
##→s##=##\frac {1}{2}####(u+v)t## as required in the problem...
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K