Find suitable SI units to work with a Vibration Sensor

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying suitable SI units for interpreting the output of a wireless vibration sensor used in an IoT project, particularly in the context of a CNC machine. Participants explore the implications of the sensor's readings and how to effectively utilize them.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the vibration sensor outputs values in 'g', which they interpret as acceleration due to gravity, and seeks suitable SI units for CNC applications.
  • Another participant suggests that values expressed as a fraction of 'g' can be converted to a unit system by multiplying by the gravitational constant (9.8 m/s²), but emphasizes that the utility of the values depends on the intended application.
  • A third participant points out that vibration levels are frequency-dependent and typically represented in units such as m/sqrt(Hz) or m²/Hz, indicating that a typical low vibration level might be around 1e-6 m/sqrt(Hz).
  • One participant confirms that the values mentioned (0.75, 0.71, 0.69) are RMS values as stated in the sensor's manual, which also includes RMS, MAX, and MIN acceleration figures.
  • Another participant expresses curiosity about the project's cybersecurity priorities, indicating a broader concern beyond just the technical specifications of the sensor.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on a single suitable unit for vibration measurement, as multiple perspectives on how to interpret and utilize the sensor's output are presented. The discussion remains open-ended with various approaches suggested.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the frequency dependence of vibration measurements and the need for context in interpreting the sensor's output. There is also mention of the RMS values, but no detailed resolution on how to apply these in practice.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals working on IoT projects involving vibration sensors, particularly in industrial applications, as well as those interested in the technical aspects of vibration measurement and analysis.

Robbie64
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
We are working on an IOT project in which we are trying to learn about different vibrations of using Wireless Vibration Sensor
According to the manual, the wireless vibration sensor is giving the output while testing on CNC machine device

0.75, 0.71,0.69 whose SI units are in 'g'(which is acceleration due to gravity according to me ) but I am not aware of suitable SI units which will be useful to make it work with CNC machines.

Any suggestions on this will be a great help.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
fraction of g is unit system independent. You can put it in a unit system by multiplying by a unit system's value for g, such as 9.8m/s^2.

As for how to make it useful - that is a matter of what you (or the machine) want to use it for.
 
There is typically no single "Vibration level" since you will always have a spectrum where the level is strongly frequency dependent.
You can of course talk about the maximum vibration level throughout some frequency range (say 0.1-100 Hz) ; and this then typically given in units of m/sqrt(Hz) (meters per square root Hertz); orr alternatively m2/Hz (same thing squared) .
A typical level for a low(ish) vibration system would be of the order of 1e-6 m/sqrt(Hz)
 
+1 to what Russ said.

The manual also says "Industrial Grade 3-axis Vibration Sensor with RMS, MAX and MIN acceleration in g". Are those the three figures you quoted 0.75, 0.72, 0.69?
 
Robbie64 said:
We are working on an IOT project
I'm curious. Is cybersecurity a priority for your project?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and jim hardy
Hello @CWatters
This value is RMS value only I 'll check with above-shared formulae also to get the desired values
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
903
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K