Find the attractive force of gravity between two objects

Click For Summary
Henry Cavendish's historical experiment involved measuring the gravitational force between two lead spheres to determine the gravitational constant "G." The calculation of the attractive force was initially incorrect due to miscalculations of the masses and the assumption of gravitational acceleration. The correct approach involves using the density of lead to accurately find the masses of the spheres. After correcting the calculations, the attractive force was determined to be approximately 1.18 x 10^(-6) N. Proper understanding of the relationship between mass, distance, and gravitational force is essential for accurate results.
ac7597
Messages
126
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
Henry Cavendish succeeded in measuring the value of the constant "G" way back in the late 1700s. His method was to put two known masses at a known distance and measure the attractive force between them; then he could use Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation to find "G".
The basic idea was to put a big sphere of a dense material next to a small sphere of dense material. Cavendish chose lead. He made one big ball with radius 5.6 inches, and one small ball with radius 1.9 inches. He then placed them next to each other, with a gap of just 0.5 inches between their closest surfaces.

How large was the attractive force of gravity between these two balls?
Relevant Equations
F=G(mass1)(mass2)/(radius)^2
G=6.67 * 10 ^(-11)
Homework Statement: Henry Cavendish succeeded in measuring the value of the constant "G" way back in the late 1700s. His method was to put two known masses at a known distance and measure the attractive force between them; then he could use Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation to find "G".
The basic idea was to put a big sphere of a dense material next to a small sphere of dense material. Cavendish chose lead. He made one big ball with radius 5.6 inches, and one small ball with radius 1.9 inches. He then placed them next to each other, with a gap of just 0.5 inches between their closest surfaces.

How large was the attractive force of gravity between these two balls?
Homework Equations: F=G(mass1)(mass2)/(radius)^2
G=6.67 * 10 ^(-11)

total radius=((5.6in)+(1.9in)+(0.5in))(0.0254m) = 0.203m

(mass1)(9.8m/s^2)=(6.67 * 10 ^(-11) ) (mass1)(mass2)/( (5.6in)(0.0254 m) )^2
mass2=2.97 * 10^(9) kg

(mass2)(9.8m/s^2)=(6.67 * 10 ^(-11) ) (mass1)(mass2)/( (1.9in)(0.0254 m) )^2
mass1=342.2 * 10^(6) kg

F=(6.67 * 10 ^(-11) )(342.2 * 10^(6)) (2.97 * 10^(9)) / (0.203m)^2
F=1.645 * 10^(9) N
Apparently this incorrect. I don't know why.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is your determination of m1 and m2. Why are you using 9.8 m/sec^2? Show us your work in determining these masses.

AM
 
Do I need to find the mass of both objects? Can I somehow cancel them out of the equation?
 
ac7597 said:
Do I need to find the mass of both objects? Can I somehow cancel them out of the equation?

If force depends on the masses, then how could the masses cancel out?
 
The density of lead does not appear in your calculations anywhere. You appear to be determining the mass of the balls by assuming that the acceleration of each ball toward the other is 9.8 m/sec^2. That is not correct. You have the mass of a lead ball of radius 1.9 inches at 342 million kilograms!

AM
 
  • Haha
Likes phinds
This the correct force=1.18 * 10^(-6) N ?
 
ac7597 said:
This the correct force=1.18 * 10^(-6) N ?
You should show us how you arrived at that answer.

AM
 
The top portion is for this question
 

Attachments

  • wLKnxWIuQYy%pr5dXFkRdw.jpg
    wLKnxWIuQYy%pr5dXFkRdw.jpg
    46 KB · Views: 314
Your method is correct. If you use 11.34 g/cc for the density of lead the answer should work out to 1.18 e-6 N.

AM
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K