Finding the net gravitational force with Vector Notation

Ella1777
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Information Given: In the figure, a square of edge length 17.0 cm is formed by four spheres of masses m1 = 4.70 g, m2 = 2.90 g, m3 = 0.800 g, and m4 = 4.70 g.

Question: In unit-vector notation, what is the net gravitational force from them on a central sphere with mass m5 = 2.90 g? Attempted Solution:F=k*m1*m2/r^2
r= (sqrt (0.1m)^2 + (0.1m)^2)=0.1414m
F25=(6.67*10^-11)(0.0290)/0.1414m
F25=1.36796322*10^-11

F35=(1.36796322*10^-11)/4=3.14990806*10...

Resultant: F25-F35=(1.36796322*10^-11)-(3.141990806...

Horizontal:( 2.77917256*10^-13) cos(45)= 1.4596046*10^-13 N

Vertical: (2.77917256*10^-13) sin (45)= 1.2422855*10^-13 N
Answer(Incorrect):1.46e-13 i + 1.24e-13 j N
I don't understand I checked this several times yet it's incorrect!
Help is greatly appreciated
Thank You!
 
Please retain and use the formatting template that is provided in the edit window to prepare your homework help requests.

Ella1777 said:
Information Given: In the figure, a square of edge length 17.0 cm is formed by four spheres of masses m1 = 4.70 g, m2 = 2.90 g, m3 = 0.800 g, and m4 = 4.70 g.

Question: In unit-vector notation, what is the net gravitational force from them on a central sphere with mass m5 = 2.90 g?Attempted Solution:F=k*m1*m2/r^2
r= (sqrt (0.1m)^2 + (0.1m)^2)=0.1414m
Where did the 0.1m values come from? Did you draw a sketch of the setup?
F25=(6.67*10^-11)(0.0290)/0.1414m
F25=1.36796322*10^-11
Where did the 0.0290 value come from?
F35=(1.36796322*10^-11)/4=3.14990806*10...

Resultant: F25-F35=(1.36796322*10^-11)-(3.141990806...

Horizontal:( 2.77917256*10^-13) cos(45)= 1.4596046*10^-13 N

Vertical: (2.77917256*10^-13) sin (45)= 1.2422855*10^-13 N
Assuming that "F25" means the force of m2 on m5, then what happened to the calculations for the other masses? Shouldn't there be F15, F25, F35, and F45?
 
A diagram would reduce the confusion.
1. In calculating F25, why did you use r in the denominator? Should it not be r2?
2. In the numerator, you seem to use only one of the masses, instead of the product of the two masses.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
21K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K