Find the change in entropy for an ideal gas undergoing a reversible process

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the change in entropy for an ideal gas during a reversible process. The initial approach uses the first law of thermodynamics and integrates expressions for internal energy and pressure. Corrections are suggested, emphasizing the need for a general expression for internal energy that accounts for the number of moles and molar heat capacity. The participants confirm the importance of including the factor of the number of moles in the calculations. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of thermodynamic calculations and encourages further practice.
mcas
Messages
22
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
An ideal gad had a temperature ##T_1## and volume ##V_1##. As a result of a reversible process, these quantities changed to ##T_2## and ##V_2##. Find the change in entropy.
Relevant Equations
##pV=nRT##
##\delta Q = TdS##
##dU = \delta Q + \delta W##
##U = \frac{3}{2}kT##
We know that
$$dU=\delta Q + \delta W$$
$$dU = TdS - pdV$$
So from this:
$$dS = \frac{1}{T}dU + \frac{1}{T}pdV \ (*)$$
For an ideal gas:
$$dU = \frac{3}{2}nkdT$$
Plugging that into (*) and also from ##p=\frac{nRT}{V}## we get:
$$S = \frac{3}{2}nk \int^{T_2}_{T_1} \frac{1}{T}dT + R\int^{V_2}_{V_1} \frac{1}{V}dV$$

And so on...

Is this the correct approach to solve this problem? I'm not really sure because I'm still new to thermodynamics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your approach looks good. A couple of things, though.

mcas said:
##U = \frac{3}{2}kT##
This equation is for a monatomic ideal gas and it's missing a factor of ##N## (the number of molecules). But the question does not specify that the gas is monatomic. So, you'll need a more general expression for ##U## (usually expressed in terms of the number of moles ##n##, the molar heat capacity at constant volume, ##C_V##, and ##T##).

$$S = \frac{3}{2}nk \int^{T_2}_{T_1} \frac{1}{T}dT + R\int^{V_2}_{V_1} \frac{1}{V}dV$$
The first term should be corrected according to the remarks above. The second term is missing a factor. Can you spot it?
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi and mcas
TSny said:
So, you'll need a more general expression for ##U## (usually expressed in terms of the number of moles ##n##, the molar heat capacity at constant volume, ##C_V##, and ##T##).
Ok, thank you. I think I know which one :smile:

TSny said:
The first term should be corrected according to the remarks above. The second term is missing a factor. Can you spot it?
I missed ##n##, right?

Thank you, this means very much! Now I have the motivation to do more problems 😁
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi and TSny
mcas said:
I missed ##n##, right?
Yes.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
889
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K