Find the coefficient of kinetic friction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a skier weighing 90 kg who starts from rest on a hill inclined at 17 degrees and skis down before coasting 70 m on level snow. The goal is to find the coefficient of kinetic friction between the skis and the snow, as well as the skier's velocity at the bottom of the hill.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of kinematic equations and the work-energy principle to analyze the skier's motion. There are attempts to derive the coefficient of kinetic friction using different methods, including energy considerations and force analysis.

Discussion Status

Some participants have pointed out potential errors in the original poster's calculations, particularly regarding the ratios used in the equations. Others have suggested alternative methods and emphasized the importance of checking assumptions and signs in the equations. The discussion is ongoing, with multiple interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted concern regarding the realism of the data provided, as well as the requirement for the coefficient of kinetic friction to fall within a certain range (0 to 1). Participants are also addressing specific sign errors in the application of kinematic formulas.

yanase
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A skier weighing 90kg starts from rest down a hill inclined at 17 degree. He skis down the hill and then coast for 70 m along level snow until he stops. Find the coefficient of kinetic friction between the skis and the snow. What velocity does the skier have at the bottom of the hill?

Homework Equations


θ=17degree, sA=100m, sB=70m, m=90kg


The Attempt at a Solution


A-motion skis down the hill
B-motion along level snow

A:
mg sin θ - Ff = maA ------ 1 ;Ff is the frictional force
N - mg cos θ = 0
→ N = mg cos θ -------- 2

Ff = μN ----------------- 3 ; μ is coefficient of kinetic friction

3→1
mg sin θ - μN = maA ------- 4

2→4
mg sin θ - μmg cos θ = maA
aA = g(sin θ - μcos θ) ---- 5

B:
-Ff = maB ---------------- 6
down the hill
N - mg = 0 → N = mg ---- 7

3→6
-μN = maB --------------- 8

6→7
-μmg = maB
aB = -μg

using v2=u2+2as ;
u=0 since it starts from rest,
v2=2as

vA2=2aAsA
vB2=2aBsB

vA2 = vB2
2aAsA = 2aBsB
aA = -(μgsB)/sA ; aB = -μg


g(sin θ - μcos θ)= -(μgsB)/sA
μ(cos θ - sA/sB) = sin θ
μ = (sin θ)/(cos θ - sA/sB)

Substituting θ=17degree, sA=100m, sB=70m into the equation,
μ = (sin 17)/(cos 17 – 70/100)
= 1.14

The value of μ should be between 0 and 1. Can anyone tell me where I went wrong in solving this question? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Apply work-energy principle.
 
Last edited:
Your work looks OK to me.
yanase said:
g(sin θ - μcos θ)= -(μgsB)/sA
μ(cos θ - sA/sB) = sin θ
μ = (sin θ)/(cos θ - sA/sB)
I think you have a typo here. That ratio should be sB/sA, not sA/sB.

Substituting θ=17degree, sA=100m, sB=70m into the equation,
μ = (sin 17)/(cos 17 – 70/100)
= 1.14
But it looks like you plugged in the correct ratios.

The value of μ should be between 0 and 1. Can anyone tell me where I went wrong in solving this question?
I don't think you went wrong. The data is just unrealistic.

Edit: I found the mistake; see my post #7. (And please look at azizlwl's alternative solution. It's always good to solve things multiple ways.)
 
Last edited:
ΔPE+ΔKE=Wf
PEi=mgh=f(x_slope)+f(x_level)
PEf=0,KEi=KEf=0
m=90kg
h=100sin17°
length on slope=100m
length on level =70m

Mg(100sin17°)=μN(x_slope)+μN(x_level)
Mg(100sin17°)=μMgCos17°(100) +μMg(70)
μ=100sin17°/(100Cos17° +70)
μ=29.23/165.63
μ=0.17
 
yanase said:
B:
-Ff = maB ---------------- 6
down the hill
N - mg = 0 → N = mg ---- 7

3→6
-μN = maB --------------- 8

6→7
-μmg = maB
aB = -μg

Deleting my comment on this.
 
Last edited:
azizlwl said:
ΔPE+ΔKE=Wf
PEi=mgh=f(x_slope)+f(x_level)
PEf=0,KEi=KEf=0
m=90kg
h=100sin17°
length on slope=100m
length on level =70m

Mg(100sin17°)=μN(x_slope)+μN(x_level)
Mg(100sin17°)=μMgCos17°(100) +μMg(70)
μ=100sin17°/(100Cos17° +70)
μ=29.23/165.63
μ=0.17
Looks good to me.

I just redid the problem using the kinematic method used in post # 1 and got the same answer.

I'll have to look to see where the error in post #1 is. Oops!

(I see the mistake... a sign error!)
 
yanase said:
using v2=u2+2as ;
u=0 since it starts from rest,
v2=2as

vA2=2aAsA
vB2=2aBsB
Careful here. For part A, the speed goes from 0 to V; but for part B the speed goes from V to 0.

So: 0 - VB2 = 2aBsB.

You have a sign error in applying the kinematic formula to the horizontal motion. Fix that and you'll get a sensible answer.

Sorry for not spotting that earlier. :redface:

Thanks to azizlwl!
 
Thank Doc Al, I'm too looking for Yanase's error which lead to wrong answer and your advice of using multiple methods.
 
Thank you very much to both of you. I really appreciate you help in solving my question. :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
Replies
48
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K