Find the n'th derivative of these

  • Thread starter Thread starter transgalactic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the n-th derivative of two functions involving absolute values: \( f(x) = |x|^{n + 1} \) and \( f(x) = |\sin x|^{n + 1} \). Participants explore the implications of differentiating functions that include absolute values and the challenges associated with points where these functions are not differentiable.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the role of the variable \( k \) and whether calculating the first derivatives by hand might reveal a pattern. There is a discussion about the nature of the derivative of absolute value functions and the implications of differentiability at specific points, particularly at \( x = 0 \). Some participants suggest breaking down the absolute value function into its piecewise components to understand the derivatives better.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the behavior of derivatives for the given functions. Some have offered guidance on how to approach the derivatives of absolute values, while others are exploring the application of the Maclaurin series and its relation to finding the n-th derivative.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the differentiability of absolute value functions at certain points, particularly at \( x = 0 \). Participants are also grappling with the implications of using the Maclaurin series for their calculations.

transgalactic
Messages
1,386
Reaction score
0
1=<k=<n
find [tex]f^{(n)} (x)[/tex] of:

the first :
[tex] f(x) = |x|^{n + 1}[/tex]
the second is:
[tex] f(x) = |\sin x|^{n + 1} [/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the use of defining k?
Did you try calculating the first derivatives by hand and looking for a pattern?
 
what is the derivative of an absolute value function??
 
For you to solve an absolute value derivative you have to realize that there are 2 parts of the function: + and -. Therefore you take the derivative of both parts and set the regions where the derivative is true.

For example:
f(x)=|x|

The line y=-x exists from -infinity to 0 and the line y=x exists from 0 to +infinity. Then the derivative of f(x) is -1 on (-infinity, 0) and 1 on (0,infinity). Hope this helps!
 
in an ordinary function
the derivative from he left must equal the derivative from the right

so we can't do a derivative to |x|
because of that?? on one side i get 1 on the other i get -1
the same thing goes for the question i need to solve
??
 
Note that what you say is a pointwise statement.
Only for x = 0 you get different limits on both sides, which means that |x| is not differentiable at x = 0. This corresponds to the intuitive notion of differentiability, which |x| doesn't satisfy at x = 0 because it has a kink / sharp point there.
However, for x non-zero, the function is perfectly smooth and differentiable.

In fact, when you do analysis you start by defining what it means if f is differentiable at a point (see your other thread, where I gave the definition) and then for colloquial convenience define just "f is differentiable" to mean: "f is differentiable at all the points in the domain".
 
the makloren formula is
[tex] f(x)=\sum_{n}^{k}\frac{f^{(k)}}{k!}x^k+o(x^n)[/tex]

how to take the n'th derivative from here??

where to put the formula in and get the n'th derivative??

this function
is for approximating so in order for me to get to the n'th members approximation
first i need to do manually one by one n times derivative
so its not helping me
??
 
for the second question:
[tex] (|\sin x|^{n}||\sin x|)^{(n)}=\sum_{k=0}^{n}C^k_n (|\sin x|^{n})^{(n-k)}|sinx|^{(k)}\\[/tex]

what to do next??
 
Differntiating f(x)= |x|n+1 is easy. if x> 0 then f(x)= xn+1 what is the nth derivative of that? For example, if n= 3, (x4)'= 4x3, (x4)"= (4x3)'= 4(3)x2, (x4)'''= (4(3)x2)'= (4)(3)(2)x. Can you generalize that?

If x< 0, f(x)= -xn+1 whenever n+1 is odd.

The derivative of |x|n+1 at x= 0 is not defined when x= 0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K