Find the Optimal Starting Time for a Tied Race in Physics Kinematics

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter leprofece
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the optimal starting time, denoted as 't', for John to start after Joe in a 300-meter race to achieve a tie. John runs at a speed of 5 m/s, while Joe runs at 3 m/s. The calculations reveal that Joe runs for 40 seconds, covering a distance of 120 meters, while John runs for 60 seconds to complete the race simultaneously. The final equations confirm that the correct value for 't' is 40 seconds.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic kinematics principles
  • Familiarity with algebraic equations and manipulation
  • Knowledge of speed, distance, and time relationships
  • Ability to solve linear equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study kinematic equations in physics
  • Learn about relative motion and its applications
  • Explore problem-solving techniques in algebra
  • Practice similar race-time optimization problems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone interested in mathematical problem-solving related to motion and speed.

leprofece
Messages
239
Reaction score
0
John runs at 5 m/s joe runs at 3m/seg the distance to run is 300 m Antony in order to do the race more exciting allows john start t seconds after joe What is the t value so that the race finishes in a tie?? what distance was allowed to joe?? Answer 40 seg and 120 m

I don't know how to denote the time of john
5t = 3 (300-t) ?'
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let's let $T$ represent the time John runs, and so $T+t$ is the time Joe runs. We know the must both run 300 m during their respective times, and so we may write:

$$5T=3(T+t)$$

$$5T=300\implies T=60$$

Can you proceed?
 
sure 5T -3T = t
2 T = t
t = 2 *60 = 120
please I am not Sure cooecte me if I am not correct
and thanks for you reply greetings and regards
 
You should have:

$$5T-3T=3t$$

You didn't distribute the $3$ before...:D
 
2T = 3t

2(60) = 3t
so t = 40 seg

Ok and now: 3 (40) = 120 m

ithink i am ruight now do I?
 
leprofece said:
2T = 3t

2(60) = 3t
so t = 40 seg

Ok and now: 3 (40) = 120 m

ithink i am ruight now do I?

Yes, that's correct! (Sun)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
15K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
1K