MHB Find the probability all 5 dice rolls are the same

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcadams267
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dice Probability
marcadams267
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
Given 5 dice rolls that are independent from each other, what is the probability for the following results? (order of roll does not matter)

1. all 5 dice rolls are the same

2. 4 dice rolls are the same

3. the dice rolls are in sequence (1-5 or 2-6) -order does not matter

4. two pairs of dice are the same (ex: 1 1 4 4 3)

5. the result is one pair and the other three are the same (ex: 1 1 1 6 6)So far, my understanding of the problem has been the ff:
1. 1/6^5
2. 150/6^5
3.(5!+5!)/6^5
4. 1800/6^5
5. 300/6^5

Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
marcadams267 said:
Given 5 dice rolls that are independent from each other, what is the probability for the following results? (order of roll does not matter)

1. all 5 dice rolls are the same

2. 4 dice rolls are the same

3. the dice rolls are in sequence (1-5 or 2-6) -order does not matter

4. two pairs of dice are the same (ex: 1 1 4 4 3)

5. the result is one pair and the other three are the same (ex: 1 1 1 6 6)So far, my understanding of the problem has been the ff:
1. 1/6^5
No, this is the probability all 5 are the same specific number. That is, that all 5 are 1 or all 5 are 2, etc. Since there are 6 possible numbers the probability all 5 die are the same number is 5/6^5.

2. 150/6^5[//quote]
The probability the first 4 die are, say, "1" and the other die any other number is (1/6^5)(5/6)= 5/6^5. Since there are 5 "positions" in which the "1" might appear the probability of 4 "1"s and one other number is 25/6^5. But, again, there are 6 number the 4 die might be so the probability of 4 dice being the same number and one die being different is 5(25/6^5)= 125/6^5. How did you get 150?

3.(5!+5!)/6^5
The probability the five die are "1, 2, 3, 4, 5" in that order is 1/6^5. There are 5! different orders so the probability of "1, 2, 3, 4, 5" in any order is 5/6^5. Of course, it is exactly the same for "2, 3, 4, 5. 6" so you are correct.

4. 1800/6^5
The first die could be any thing. The probability that the next die is the same, so that the first two die are the same, is 1/6. The probability the third die is different from the first two is 5/6. The probability the fourth is the same as the third is 1/6. The probability the last is different from either of those is 4/6= 2/3. The probability of "AABBC" is (1/6)(5/6)(1/6)(4/6)= 4/6^4. But there are (2!2!)/5! different orders so this probability is (4(2!2!))/(6^4(5!)). That is 1/(480(6^4)) How did you get 1800?

5. 300/6^5
The first die can be anything. The probability the next two dice are the same is 1/6^2. The probability the fourth die is anything other than that is 5/6. The probability the fifth die is the same as the fourth is 1/6. The probability of "AAABB" is (1/6^2)(5/6)(1/6)= 5/6^4. There are 5!/(3!2!)= 10 ways to order "AAABB" so the probability of three the same and two the same but different from the others is 50/6^4. Since 300/6= 50, that is the same as your answer.
Is this correct?
 
For #2, I got 150 from the ff:

number of choices for the number showing on the dice = 6
number of ways of choosing which 4 dice the four of a kind will appear on = 5C4 = 5!/(1!4!) = 5
number of choices for the last number on the last dice = 6-1 = 5
number of ways to choose the last dice = 1C1 = 1

So the number of correct outcomes is 6*5*5*1 = 150

For #4, I got 1800 from the ff:

Number of choices for the number on first pair = 6
number of ways which two dice have the number =5C2 = 10
number of choices for number on second pair = 5
number of ways which two dice have the number = 3C2 = 3
number of choices for number on last dice = 4
number of ways of choosing last dice = 1C1 = 1
correct outcomes = 6*10*5*3*4*1 = 3600

However, this counts each pair twice (66554 is treated separate than 55664)
so i divide 3600 by 2 = 1800
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top