MHB Find the ratio of Alan and Jenny's speeds

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathgeek7365
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ratio
AI Thread Summary
Alan and Jenny are moving towards each other, with Alan jogging down a hill and Jenny biking up. After they pass each other, Jenny takes 81 times longer to reach the top than Alan takes to reach the bottom. By analyzing their speeds and the distances traveled, it is determined that the ratio of Alan's speed to Jenny's speed is 9:1. This conclusion is reached through the equations derived from their respective distances and times before and after they meet. The final ratio indicates that Alan is significantly faster than Jenny.
mathgeek7365
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Alan is a jogger that leaves the top of a hill heading for the bottom of the hill. At the same time, Jenny, a biker, heads up the hill attempting to reach the top. They each proceed at a steady rate. After passing each other, Jenny takes 81 times as long to reach the top as Alan takes to reach the bottom. What is the ratio of their speeds?

D1 is Alan's first distance, D2 is Alan's second distance, T1 is Alan's first time, T2 is Alan's second time, R is Alan's rate, d1 is Jenny's first distance, d2 is Jenny's second distance, t1 is Jenny's first time, t2 is Jenny's second time, and r is Jenny's rate. Note that "first distance, second distance, first time, and second time" is before or after they meet. For example, d2 would be Jenny's distance traveled after she passes Alan.

What we have done so far is writing different equations based on the information given/known. We know that d=rt, and can be rearranged to be r=d/t or t=d/r. These are the equations we have so far:
D1= R(T1), d1= r(t1)
D2= R(T2), d2= r(81t1)

We also rearranged some of the equations above, so:
81T2= d2/r, T1= D1/R, and t1= d1/r

This is all we have. Is this right so far? If so, how do we finish the problem? If not, what do we need to do differently?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi mathgeek7365,

Let $h$ be the vertical distance between the top and bottom of the hill. In time $t$, Alan has traveled a distance equal to $h - Rt$; in time $t$, Jenny has traveled a distance equal to $rt$. Alan and Jenny meet when $h - Rt = rt$. Solving for $t$, we find that they meet when

$$t = \frac{h}{r + R}$$

Let $t_0$ represent that value of $t$. If $t_A$ is the time Alan takes to reach the bottom from the top of the hill, then his vertical distance from the ground is zero, i.e., $h - Rt_A = 0$. Solving for $t_A$ yields $t_A = \frac{h}{R}$. If $t_J$ is the time Jenny takes to reach the top from the bottom of the hill, then her vertical distance from the ground is $h$, i.e., $rt_J = h$. So $t_J = \frac{h}{r}$. Now since after they meet, it takes Jenny $81$ times as long to reach the top as it takes Alan to reach the bottom, then

$$t_J - t_0 = 81(t_A - t_0)$$

$$\frac{h}{r} - \frac{h}{r + R} = 81\left(\frac{h}{R} - \frac{h}{r + R}\right)$$

$$\frac{hR}{r(r + R)} = 81\frac{hr}{R(r + R)}$$

$$\frac{R}{r} = \frac{81r}{R}$$

Cross multiplying results in $R^2 = 81r^2$; taking square roots on both sides gives $R = 9 r$. Hence

$$R : r = 9 : 1$$
 
Another way to approach this is to let:

$$d_A$$ = the distance traveled by Alan after they meet

$$d_J$$ = the distance traveled by Jenny after they meet

Thus:

$$d_A=r_At$$

$$d_J=r_J(81t)$$

From this, we determine:

$$\frac{r_A}{r_J}=81\frac{d_A}{d_J}$$

Now, since the distance traveled by Alan before they meet is equal to the distance Jenny travels after they meet, and likewise the distance traveled by Jenny before they meet is equal to the distance Alan travels after they meet we also have:

$$\frac{d_A}{d_J}=\frac{r_J}{r_A}$$

Thus:

$$\frac{r_A}{r_J}=81\frac{r_J}{r_A}\implies \frac{r_A}{r_J}=9$$

And so we conclude:

$$r_A:r_J=9:1$$
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top