Find the Rotational Inertia of a Square Rigid Body

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the rotational inertia of a square rigid body formed by four identical particles at its vertices. For part (a), the inertia is calculated using I = 4M(L/2)^2. Part (b) presents challenges, with a proposed formula of I = 2M(L/2)^2 + 2M(sqrt((L/2)^2 + L^2))^2. Part (c) simplifies to ML^2, which matches the result from part (a). The participants emphasize the importance of visualizing the axes of rotation and using the correct formulas for point masses.
VitaX
Messages
183
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Four identical particles of mass 0.717 kg each are placed at the vertices of a 3.11 m x 3.11 m square and held there by four massless rods, which form the sides of the square. What is the rotational inertia of this rigid body about an axis that (a) passes through the midpoints of opposite sides and lies in the plane of the square, (b) passes through the midpoint of one of the sides and is perpendicular to the plane of the square, and (c) lies in the plane of the square and passes through two diagonally opposite particles?

Homework Equations



I think I = 1/12M(a^2 + b^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't really know how to go about solving this, the way its worded is confusing me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone can give me a hint or something on how to do this?
 
VitaX said:

Homework Equations



I think I = 1/12M(a^2 + b^2)
That doesn't look right.

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't really know how to go about solving this, the way its worded is confusing me.
Look up the moment of inertia for a point mass (particle) that is a distance r from the rotation axis.
 
I = mr^2

I thought I had to use I = Icom + Mh^2

The hard part for me is drawing these out and finding what r would be each part.
 
Last edited:
VitaX said:
I = mr^2

I thought I had to use I = Icom + Mh^2
You could use Icom + Mh2, but for a few point masses it's probably easiest to calculate ∑mr2 directly.

The hard part for me is drawing these out and finding what r would be each part.
I would start by simply drawing a square first. Then figure out where the axis is in relation to the square.

If the axis is perpendicular to the plane of the square, you can just draw a dot or "x" in the figure showing where it passes through the plane.
 
Redbelly98 said:
You could use Icom + Mh2, but for a few point masses it's probably easiest to calculate ∑mr2 directly.I would start by simply drawing a square first. Then figure out where the axis is in relation to the square.

If the axis is perpendicular to the plane of the square, you can just draw a dot or "x" in the figure showing where it passes through the plane.

I understand that part a is just I=4M(L/2)^2

Part b is giving me trouble but I think it is I = 2M(L/2)^2 + 2M(sqroot((L/2)^2 + L^2))^2

Part c is 2M(sqroot((L/2)^2 + (L/2)^2))^2 which goes down to ML^2 which is same as part a
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K