Find the speed of an electron accelerated through a potential difference

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the speed of electrons accelerated through a potential difference of 20,000 volts in a color television tube. The correct approach involves using the kinetic energy (KE) of 20,000 eV and the rest energy of the electron (0.51099 MeV) to find the speed. The participants clarify that 20,000 eV equals 0.02 MeV, which is significantly smaller than the rest energy, allowing for the use of non-relativistic mechanics. The final speed of the electrons is determined to be approximately 0.27c, confirming the calculations once the correct energy values are used.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic energy and rest energy concepts
  • Familiarity with electron mass (9.109 x 10^-31 kg)
  • Knowledge of energy units (eV and MeV) and their conversions
  • Basic grasp of relativistic mechanics and the equation E=mc²
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the conversion between electron volts (eV) and mega electron volts (MeV)
  • Learn about non-relativistic versus relativistic kinetic energy equations
  • Explore the implications of relativistic speeds on particle physics
  • Practice solving problems involving potential differences and particle acceleration
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism and particle dynamics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to electron acceleration and energy calculations.

Miri
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In a color television tube, electrons are accelerated through a potential difference of 20 000 volts. With what speed do the electrons strike the screen?
mass of electron=9.109*10^-31kg or 0.51099 MeV/c^2


Homework Equations


I don't know which formula I have to use. When I use E=mc^2/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) I first have to add the kinetic energy (20 000eV) and the rest energy of the electron (0.51099MeV) and than solve for x (which is v^2/c^2). The solution should be 0.27c but I never get it...Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have the right formula. Can you show your math? It sounds like there is a simple arithmetic error somewhere.

p.s. if instead you use the nonrelativistic expression for kinetic energy, the answer will not be very different.
 
Ok. For E I use 20 000.51099MeV (KE+rest energy)
For mc^2 I use 0.51099MeV and for v^2/c^2 I use x because that's the thing I want to know. Then I put everything into the solver like this: solve(20000.51099=0.51099/sqrt(1-x^2),x) and my calculator says x is -1 or 1 (exact nr.: 0.99999999967363) I really don't know why I always get the wrong result...
 
Okay. The kinetic energy is
KE = 20 000 eV 20 000 MeV​
 
Thank you. But it doesn't change nothing when I use 20 000*10^6 eV + 0.51099MeV...Heeelp :S
 
I think you need to double-check your conversion of 20,000 eV to MeV. 1,000,000 eV = 1 MeV
 
The rest energy is .511MeV = 511,000eV

The kinetic is 20,000eV

You see how the kinetic energy is not larger than the rest energy? It is in fact smaller by about 25 times. This is why Redbelly said you can use non-relativistic mechanics because the kinetic energy is only a small fraction of the rest energy.

The way you have it now, your kinetic energy is 40,000 times larger than your rest energy...which is why you get an answer ridiculously close to c.
 
Miri said:
Thank you. But it doesn't change nothing when I use 20 000*10^6 eV + 0.51099MeV...Heeelp :S

And it shouldn't change, because you are just repeating the same mistake.

20 000 eV is not, I repeat not, 20 000*106 eV.

To do the units conversion from eV to MeV:

20000 eV * (1 MeV/10^6 eV) = ____ ?
 
oh yes..thank you very much..I forgot the minus: 20000*10^-6 eV=0.02MeV...Thank you for your patience :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K