Find the sum of this series when n goes from 1 to infinite

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
24 replies · 3K views
monsmatglad
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
((2x-1)^n)/n find the sum of this series when n goes from 1 to infinite
please help

I have tried this several times, but it doesn't match with the true answer.

thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Try substituting in u=2x - 1 for now, to get [itex]\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{u^n}{n}[/itex], which is easily recognizable as the integral of u^(n-1). Now, do you know the series for u^(n-1)?
 


what I tried was to derivate to get rid of the n under, which then gave me 2*(2x-1)^n-1. Then I used the sum of a geometric series, getting: 2/(1-(2x-1))= 2/(2-2x)=1/(1-x).
Then i integrated back 1/(1-t) with t going from 0 to x. Then I get -ln(1-t), but this does not fit with what the answer should be.
 


Actually, the solution IS correct, up to a constant. The problem is, by deriving, you lost the constant. So all you need to do now is figure out what that constant term is.
 


that's good news:P but I don't see how to find the constant term. The true answer should be -ln(2-2x) .
 


Try factoring that. You get -ln(2 (1 - x)). Using the rules of logarithms, how can you factor that out?
 


-(ln2+ln(1-x)), but i don't see how to derive this without going through the true answer.
 


I mean, how do I get to the constant without using the correct answer to derive from.
 


That might have been a bit fuzzy due to some sloppiness with names, but basically I need to know how to find that constant term that disappears when deriving.
 


So you've figured out correctly that

[tex]\sum_{n=1}^{+\infty}{\frac{(2x-1)^n}{n}}=-ln(1-x)+C[/tex]

So, if you fill in a particular x, then this equality must hold. You might fill in 0 for x, but then you'll have to evaluate the series

[tex]\sum_{n=1}^{+\infty}{\frac{(-1)^n}{n}}[/tex]

which may be a little difficult. Can you think of an x that will make the serie easy? (for example, an x such that all the terms of the series are 0?)
 


ehm. x=2 can't be correct, but with x=0, you get ln(1)=0
right?
 


Will the series be easy if you fill in x=2? You will get the series

[tex]\sum_{n=1}^{+\infty}{\frac{3^n}{n}}[/tex]

which isn't easy to determine.

In fact, you probably have somewhere in your assignment the contraint that [itex]0<x<1[/itex]. So you can't fill in 2 since the series will diverge for that value!
 


monsmatglad said:
that was supposed to be 1/2 without the minus

Yes! That is good. What do you get for x=1/2?
 


ah, so any value that makes the serie converge will do?
 


monsmatglad said:
ah, so any value that makes the serie converge will do?

Well, yes and no. Every value that makes the series converge will do in the sense that it gives you a value for C.
However, you will want to pick a value for x that makes the serie easy. If you pick x=1/2, then this is the case since the series will vanish. So this is the ideal value to take! You can pick x=3/4 if you want, but the serie will be much more difficult to evaluate!
 


so, i pick 1/2. How do I get from that to getting the constant -ln2?
 


Remember first that you have f(x) = -ln(1 - x) + C, and you want to find C.
 


i think i have got it. i get 0 on one side av ln2 + C on the other. moving them around gives - ln2. correct?
 


That's correct. So now you have your constant term, and can write the answer to the series.