Find time t at which the speed of the particle is minimized

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the time at which the speed of a particle, described by the position vector r(t) = −3t²i + 2tj + (t² − 3t)k, is minimized. The context is rooted in calculus and vector analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the process of finding the derivative of the velocity vector to determine the speed's minimum. Questions arise about the correct interpretation of speed and its relationship to the magnitude of the velocity vector.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the concepts related to the magnitude of vectors and the minimization process. Some participants affirm the correctness of the initial approach, while others seek clarification on the relationship between speed and the squared magnitude of the velocity vector.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the definitions and properties of vector magnitudes and their implications for the problem at hand. There is a mix of assumptions about mathematical principles and their applications in this context.

popo902
Messages
59
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If r(t) = −3t2i+2tj+(t2 −3t)k gives the position
of a particle at time t, find the time t at which the speed of the
particle is minimized.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



i know for minimization and maximization, you find the derivative and solve for the variable and see which values produces a largest or smallest value when plugged into the original equation right?

so, since this is asking for speed, would it be right to find the deriv of this (v(t)) and find the absolute value of it (|(v(t)| = s(t)) then find the derivative of s(t) and solve for t?
and just a side question but, s(t) is just the magnitude of the velocity vector right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How can you take the absolute value of a vector? Do you mean that you want to dot it with itself? That would give you a scalar valued function of t that would have the value of the length of the velocity vector squared at a particular t.

You could then minimize that.
 
Yes, I think that's all pretty right.
 
so basically minimize s(t) not s'(t)?
 
Well, yeah. Minimize s(t)=|v(t)|. Which as aPhilosopher pointed out is the same as sqrt(v(t).v(t)). Which in turn is minimized at the same time as v(t).v(t).
 
Last edited:
i didn't know that s(t) was the same as sqrt( v(t) dot v(t) ), is this a theorem...or just common sense? X|
 
What's your expression for the magnitude of a vector v(t)? Isn't it the same as sqrt(v(t) dot v(t))?
 
It's sooooort of common sense once you've been shown how to think about it the right way.

In one definition, you have the magnitude of the vector squared times the cosine of zero.

In the other definition, you have (x1, x2, x3)2 = x12 + x22 + x32. This is just one side of the Pythagorean theorem in three dimensions. The other side is the length squared.
 
aPhilosopher said:
It's sooooort of common sense once you've been shown how to think about it the right way.

In one definition, you have the magnitude of the vector squared times the cosine of zero.

In the other definition, you have (x1, x2, x3)2 = x12 + x22 + x32. This is just one side of the Pythagorean theorem in three dimensions. The other side is the length squared.
All mathematics is "common sense once you think about it the right way"!
 
  • #10
HallsofIvy said:
All mathematics is "common sense once you think about it the right way"!

Ahhhhhh, but is thinking about it the right way "common sense"? Perhaps you hold common sense in higher esteem than I do ;)
 
  • #11
Look carefully at what I said, "Philospher"! I did not say that "looking at it the right way" is common sense. I said that, once you have looked at it the right way, the rest is "common sense".
 
  • #12
If by common sense, you mean easy, or at least doable, then I agree whole heartedly! I was just taking a dig at common sense. My apologies for the confusion.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K