Finding the Time of Max and 0 Angular Speed

Raymour
20170730_164233.jpg

Homework Statement


Mod note: Fixed thread title. OOPS NOT Acceleration, Speed! (Thread title is incorrect)

Homework Equations


w=d∅/dt
v=rw
x={+,-√(b2-4ac)}/2a

The Attempt at a Solution


I solved this with help from Chegg study, however, I'm still not entirely sure what I am doing. Obviously, for part a, you differentiate the position to get the angular velocity which is w=5t-1.8t2. At that point I struggled. Chegg answers simply differentiated twice to find the time of maximum angular speed as 1.39 s. Is that because ∝=5-3.6t gives the time of maximum acceleration? and therefore max speed?

My first instinct was to perform the quadratic of the speed equation to give me t= 2.78 s and 1.39 s. One is the time of max speed and one is when it is zero (aka part c for when it will reverse direction)... How do I know which is which other than having ruled 1.39 out in part a? For part c, Chegg used the equation t(5t-1.8t2)=0 to find the time.But I'm not sure where that equation came from. Where are they taking the t out front from? Is there a better way to do this? Once I can get the time, I am fine to solve the rest.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Raymour said:
View attachment 208018

Homework Statement


Mod note: Fixed thread title. OOPS NOT Acceleration, Speed! (Thread title is incorrect)

Homework Equations


w=d∅/dt
v=rw
x={+,-√(b2-4ac)}/2a

The Attempt at a Solution


I solved this with help from Chegg study, however, I'm still not entirely sure what I am doing. Obviously, for part a, you differentiate the position to get the angular velocity which is w=5t-1.8t2. At that point I struggled. Chegg answers simply differentiated twice to find the time of maximum angular speed as 1.39 s. Is that because ∝=5-3.6t gives the time of maximum acceleration? and therefore max speed?
Although you could differentiate again, in this case it isn't required. Your angular velocity, ##\omega(t)##, is a quadratic polynomial whose graph is a parabola, so to find the times where ##\omega## is zero, simply solve the equation ##5t - 1.8t^2 = 0##. Note that there will be two times.
To find the max. angular velocity, locate the vertex of the parabola.
Raymour said:
My first instinct was to perform the quadratic of the speed equation to give me t= 2.78 s and 1.39 s.
One is the time of max speed and one is when it is zero (aka part c for when it will reverse direction)... How do I know which is which other than having ruled 1.39 out in part a? For part c, Chegg used the equation t(5t-1.8t2)=0 to find the time.But I'm not sure where that equation came from.
See what I wrote above. If you recognize that the graph of the angular velocity is a parabola, it should be straightforward to figure out which one is the max. point, and which is a point where ##\omega## is zero.
Raymour said:
The answer they showed (2.78 s) does not really show what they did with that equation. Is there a better way to do this? Once I can get the time, I am fine to solve the rest.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Raymour
Mark44 said:
Although you could differentiate again, in this case it isn't required. Your angular velocity, ##\omega(t)##, is a quadratic polynomial whose graph is a parabola, so to find the times where ##\omega## is zero, simply solve the equation ##5t - 1.8t^2 = 0##. Note that there will be two times.
To find the max. angular velocity, locate the vertex of the parabola.
See what I wrote above. If you recognize that the graph of the angular velocity is a parabola, it should be straightforward to figure out which one is the max. point, and which is a point where ##\omega## is zero.

I suppose that means I should start taking my graphing calculator to exams! Once I graphed it, I saw it immediately. Thank you! How do I solve this via equations, though? So differentiating twice solves the time of max speed. Is there any other method than graphing to find when the speed is 0? I mean I see how they solved t(5t-1.8t2), however I have no clue where they got the t out front from.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Raymour said:
I suppose that means I should start taking my graphing calculator to exams! Once I graphed it, I saw it immediately. Thank you! How do I solve this via equations, though? So differentiating twice solves the time of max speed. Is there any other method than graphing to find when the speed is 0? I mean I see how they solved t(5t-1.8t2), however I have no clue where they got the t out front from.
A graphing calculator isn't necessary, but recognizing a quadratic function is necessary. To find the ##\omega## intercepts, solve the equation ##5t - 1.8t^2 = 0##, which you can do by factoring to ##t(5 - 1.8t) = 0##. To find the maximum point complete the square in ##\omega = 5t - 1.8t^2##. This will result in ##\omega = -1.8(t - a)^2##, where a is the coordinate of the vertex.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K