Find unknown values of current in multi-loop circuit

  • Thread starter Thread starter mhrob24
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Current
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the analysis of voltage drop signs in a multi-loop circuit problem, specifically addressing the inconsistency in the application of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL). The participant identifies that the potential drop across the EMF source V2 should be subtracted when moving clockwise from point B, contrary to the professor's notation. The correct equation for the right loop is established as -i2R2 - i3R3 = V2, emphasizing the need for consistency in sign conventions when analyzing circuit loops. Additionally, a node equation i1 + i3 = i2 is necessary to solve for the three unknown currents.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL)
  • Familiarity with circuit analysis techniques
  • Knowledge of EMF sources and voltage drops
  • Ability to set up node equations for current analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Kirchhoff's Voltage Law applications in multi-loop circuits
  • Study consistent sign conventions in circuit analysis
  • Learn how to derive node equations for current in complex circuits
  • Practice solving circuit problems with multiple unknowns using KVL
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit analysts, and anyone preparing for exams involving circuit theory and analysis.

mhrob24
Messages
53
Reaction score
9
Homework Statement
Assign values to the currents in the circuit schematic
Relevant Equations
V = IR
Kirchhoff's rules
So I'm going over my review questions/notes provided by my professor for the upcoming exam on Tuesday, and I came across an example problem that I THINK might be a typo, but I want to make sure I'm right.

1572112053968.png
I'm not sure why the potential drop when crossing V2 is ADDED to the loop equation for the right loop and not SUBTRACTED. If we're moving clockwise from B, we will cross through the EMF source from the positive to the negative terminal, so the potential should be subtracted from the total potential. Same goes for the left loop when traveling COUNTERclockwise from point b. You will cross through the EMF source V1 from the positive to the negative terminal.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree with his signs for the voltage drops across the batteries..

He is not consistent with his voltage drop signs in the different loops based on the way that he has chosen his currents (btw you only need two). You can choose the currents in any direction you wish but you must be consistent. The convention (as I have always used ) is when you go against the current directions you chose you take the voltage drop as negative and when going from the negative terminal of the battery to the positive it is take and negative and when going from positive to negative you take it as positive. So he is consistent with the signs of the battery voltage drop.

So the first equation is correct although his sign convention is the opposite of mine when going around the left loop.

In the right loop he is inconsistent in his signs for the voltage drop across the resistors compared to the left loop. I disagree with his final equation It should be -i3R3 - i2R2 = V2

In addition you need a node equation for the currents i.e., i1 +13 = i2 , you have three unkowns therefore you need three equat
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mhrob24
gleem said:
In the right loop he is inconsistent in his signs for the voltage drop across the resistors compared to the left loop. I disagree with his final equation It should be -i3R3 - i2R2 = V2

Thank you SO much for clearing that up, honestly. I spent hours trying to figure out how it could be correct. That final equation for the right loop is what was confusing me. Her initial equation for the right loop is :

-i2R2 + V2 - i3R3

and the sign of the V2 is what was confusing me. It should be subtracted since we're crossing over the EMF source from the positive to the negative terminal. So the equation should have been :

-i2R2 - V2 - i3R3 = 0 , or as you put: -i2R2 - i3R3 = V2

Thanks again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K