MHB Find unknowns in equation going from perfect square? to quadratic format?

danielw
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi all

I'm trying to work out how to answer this type of problem.

$$(6x+2z)^2-64=(ax+2z+8)(-8+bx+cz)$$ where a, b and c > 0

I have attempted the problem by expanding the brackets:

$$=36x^2+24xz+4z^2-64$$

This is the same as $$(6x+2z)^2-(8)^2$$

Then subtracting from either 'side' of the quadratic and multiplying the result:

$$=((6x+2z)-8)*((6x+2z)+8)$$

So visually comparing these results I got
$$a=6\\
b=2\\
c=2$$

But this is wrong.

I think my method may be wrong.

I'm looking for guidance on how to solve this kind of problem.

I hope one of you can help.

Many thanks

Daniel
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi danielw and welcome to MHB! :D

The method you're using is usually called "equating coefficients" and it's a good approach. Review your work and try $a=b=6,\,c=2$.
 
Note that, in order to be able to solve for a, b, and c, the equation must be true for all x and y.
 
danielw said:
\text {Solve for }a,b,c: \;(6x+2z)^2-64\:=\: (ax+2z+8)(bx+cz-8)
\text{Expand: }\;36x^2 +24xz + 4z^2 - 64 \;=\;abx^2 + acxz - 8ax + 2bxz +2cz^2 - 16z + 8bx + 8cz - 64

\text{Equate coefficients: }\;\;36 \:=\:ab, \quad 24 \:=\:ac + 2b, \quad 4 \:=\:2c, \quad 8b-8a - 0, \quad 8c - 16 \:=\:0

\text{And we get: }\;\;\boxed{ a = 6,\;b = 6,\;c = 2}
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top