Find V Max, V Min: Solutions & Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter nobrainer612
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Max
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum (V max) and minimum (V min) voltages for two channels of an oscilloscope based on given equations and measurements. Participants explore the relationships between peak-to-peak voltage, RMS voltage, and DC offset in the context of a circuit involving resistances. The scope includes homework-related calculations and technical clarifications.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the relevant equations for V max, V min, and V rms, providing some equations related to peak-to-peak voltage and RMS voltage.
  • Another participant suggests that V max represents the maximum amplitude of the voltage waveform, while V min represents the minimum amplitude.
  • Participants share calculations for V max and V min based on different assumptions and parameters, including the impact of resistances in the circuit.
  • There is a discussion about the discrepancies between calculated values and those shown on the oscilloscope, with some participants questioning the accuracy of their calculations and the assumptions made.
  • One participant notes that the function generator's display may not reflect the true output voltage, depending on the load resistance, which could explain differences in measured values.
  • Multiple calculations for V max and V min are presented, with varying results based on different interpretations of the circuit and voltage definitions.
  • Participants express confusion over certain calculations and seek clarification on the handling of sine waves and DC offsets in their measurements.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the correct values for V max and V min, as participants present differing calculations and interpretations of the circuit parameters. Discrepancies between calculated values and oscilloscope readings contribute to ongoing uncertainty.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention that the function generator's output may not be accurately displayed depending on the load resistance, which introduces additional complexity to the calculations. There are also unresolved questions regarding the definitions of voltage types (RMS vs. peak) and the influence of circuit components on the measurements.

nobrainer612
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



1555j4j.jpg

Homework Equations



I don't know the relevant equations for V max, V min and V rms.

But I found some equations say
Vpp ( voltage peak to peak ) = 2 * Vp ( V peak)
V rms ( RMS voltage of the AC signal) = Vp / square root(2)

The Attempt at a Solution



I calculated the Vpp for the output at 3 and 4, which I called channel 1 and channel 2. Vpp of channel 1 is 4.8, and Vpp for channel 2 is 2.4So if anyone knows how to find V max, V min and V rms, please tell me how to do it

Thanks a lot
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you re size this picture (much less white space) and show your calculations for each voltage?

I believe Vmax in this context is the maximum amplitude (magnitude) of the voltage waveform, and Vmin is correspondingly the minimum amplitude.
 
Zryn said:
Can you re size this picture (much less white space) and show your calculations for each voltage?

I believe Vmax in this context is the maximum amplitude (magnitude) of the voltage waveform, and Vmin is correspondingly the minimum amplitude.


I couldn't edited the original picture, so here is the resized one

6iegt4.jpg



The oscilloscope showed the V max and Vmin for channel 1 is: 3.938 V and -843.8mV
for channel 2 is: 2.031 V and -406.2

I got to compare my calculated result with the result shown by the oscilloscope

so here is how I calculated V max: 3 sin(2*pi*1000t) * (200/250) = 0.8208 for channel 1

The difference is too large so I think I did something wrong.
 
The picture has changed from R1 = 1000R to R1 = 50R!

so here is how I calculated V max: 3 sin(2*pi*1000t) * (200/250) = 0.8208 for channel 1

I can't replicate this calculation. What did you use for t?

Since we're only using resistances there are no components in the circuit which will alter the angle and phase, so we can be content to use only the value of the sin wave.

i.e. 3 * 200/250 = 0.8208 ... which looks wrong to me. Additionally, the sin wave is not the only voltage, and the DC voltage is actually labeled 'offset' in the second picture. How does all this come together? Can you show a picture of the combination of the two voltages, and understand how the picture comes about?

How does the program that you use handle sin waves? In the picture you have 3 sin(wt), but is that 3 a Vrms or a Vmax?

What do you actually expect to get at Channel1 and Channel2?

Sorry for all the questions, I'm just trying to give you to the answer, instead of giving the answer to you.
 
Zryn said:
The picture has changed from R1 = 1000R to R1 = 50R!



I can't replicate this calculation. What did you use for t?

Since we're only using resistances there are no components in the circuit which will alter the angle and phase, so we can be content to use only the value of the sin wave.

i.e. 3 * 200/250 = 0.8208 ... which looks wrong to me. Additionally, the sin wave is not the only voltage, and the DC voltage is actually labeled 'offset' in the second picture. How does all this come together? Can you show a picture of the combination of the two voltages, and understand how the picture comes about?

How does the program that you use handle sin waves? In the picture you have 3 sin(wt), but is that 3 a Vrms or a Vmax?

What do you actually expect to get at Channel1 and Channel2?

Sorry for all the questions, I'm just trying to give you to the answer, instead of giving the answer to you.

ok I tried to calculate V max and V min and here is what I got:

I know max in sin wave is 1 and min is -1.

V max at channel 1 is: V max = V ac + V dc

V ac = 3(1) * ( 200/250) = 2.4
V dc = 1 * ( 200 / 250) = 0.8

V max = 2.4 + 0.8 = 3.2

V min at channel 1 is:

V ac = 3(-1) * (200/250) = -2.4
V dc = 1* (200/250) = 0.8

V min = -2.4 + 0.8 = -1.6

I don't know if this answer sounds right to you, thanks a lot
 
Vmax = 3.2V and Vmin = -1.6V for Channel1 sounds right to me, since the sin wave would oscillate between 4V and -2V and Channel1 resistance to ground is 200R out of the circuits 250R, i.e. 4V * 200/250 = 3.2V and -2V * 200/250 = -1.6V

The oscilloscope showed the V max and Vmin for channel 1 is: 3.938 V and -843.8mV
for channel 2 is: 2.031 V and -406.2

If Channel1 represents 200/250 (or 4/5) of the circuits resistance, then the source Vmax would have to be 5V (~4V * 250/200 = 5V) and Vmin be -1V (~-0.8V * 250/200 = -1V) from that measurement, and then for Channel2 which represents 200/250 (or 2/5) of the circuits resistance, Vmax would have to be 5V and Vmin would have to be -1V.

So, either you have 3V Peak + 2V DC = Vmax of 5V and Vmin of -1V or you have 3V RMS * sqrt(2) = 4.24V Peak + 1V DC = Vmax of 5.24V and Vmin of -3.24V.

If your program is showing the sin wave with 3 as a RMS Voltage, which means Vmax is 5.24V, can you think of why you measure 3.938V instead of 5.24V * 200/250 = 4.192V as predicted?
 
Zryn said:
Vmax = 3.2V and Vmin = -1.6V for Channel1 sounds right to me, since the sin wave would oscillate between 4V and -2V and Channel1 resistance to ground is 200R out of the circuits 250R, i.e. 4V * 200/250 = 3.2V and -2V * 200/250 = -1.6V



If Channel1 represents 200/250 (or 4/5) of the circuits resistance, then the source Vmax would have to be 5V (~4V * 250/200 = 5V) and Vmin be -1V (~-0.8V * 250/200 = -1V) from that measurement, and then for Channel2 which represents 200/250 (or 2/5) of the circuits resistance, Vmax would have to be 5V and Vmin would have to be -1V.

So, either you have 3V Peak + 2V DC = Vmax of 5V and Vmin of -1V or you have 3V RMS * sqrt(2) = 4.24V Peak + 1V DC = Vmax of 5.24V and Vmin of -3.24V.

If your program is showing the sin wave with 3 as a RMS Voltage, which means Vmax is 5.24V, can you think of why you measure 3.938V instead of 5.24V * 200/250 = 4.192V as predicted?

what you just said is pretty complicated, so I need some time to digest

but the lab just asked me to find V max and V min for channel 1 and channel 2

so for channel 2:

V max :

V ac = 3(1) * (100/250) = 1.2
V dc = 1 * (100/250) = 0.4

V max = 1.2 + 0.4 = 1.6


V min:

V ac = 3(-1) * (100/250) = -1.2
V dc = 1 * (100/250) = 0.4

V min = -1.2 + 0.4 = -0.8



BUT what I just calculated is so much difference then what I got from oscilloscope:
The oscilloscope shown:

V max = 2.031 V, v min = -406.2


fd58bp.jpg



I don't know if this will be the problem. Part of the circuit is inside the function generator

according to the lab, it stated " The display on the function generator does not display the true output voltage of function generator because the internal voltage sources are always set to twice the value that appears on the display. The display only displays the actual output voltage of the generator when the function generator is loaded with a 50 ohms resistor. When the generator is loaded with a resistor much larger than 50 ohms the actual output of the generator is about twice as large the value on the display. If the function generator is loaded with a resistor much smaller than 50 ohms the displayed value will be much smaller than the output value."

Thanks a lot. Hope my answer sounds correct to you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
19K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
7K