Find Velocity of the wooden block at t=4 sec

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the velocity of a wooden block at t=4 seconds under a time-dependent force, F(t), with a mass of 2kg. The user initially miscalculated using the equation F=5t-5 and incorrectly applied kinetic friction. After clarification and showing work, the correct velocity was determined to be 10 m/s. The relevant equations discussed include F=ma and f=(μ)N, with a focus on the transition from static to kinetic friction at t=2 seconds.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law (F=ma)
  • Knowledge of friction coefficients (static and kinetic)
  • Ability to interpret force-time graphs
  • Familiarity with basic calculus concepts (differentiation for acceleration)
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to analyze force-time graphs for dynamic systems
  • Study the work-energy theorem for variable forces
  • Explore advanced friction models in physics
  • Practice problems involving time-dependent forces and motion
USEFUL FOR

Students studying classical mechanics, physics educators, and anyone interested in solving problems related to dynamics and friction in motion.

Shivam
Messages
32
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
An initially stationary wooden block with a mass of 2kg is pulled horizontally along a time dependent force f(t)i. The coefficient of static and kinetic friction between the block and the table are 0.5 and 0.25 respectively. F(t) as a function of time is shown, then find

(i) if initial velocity of the block is zero, its velocity at 4 seconds will be ?
Relevant Equations
F=ma, f=(mu)N
Here's the given F-t graph
245621


My Attempt...
Fsmax=10N & Fk= 5N
I made equatiom F=5t-5 ( by seeing Force force and Counteracting kinetic friction)
reduced the formula to a=(5t-t)/2 wrote a=dv/dt and solved it but got wrong answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shivam said:
Problem Statement: An initially stationary wooden block with a mass of 2kg is pulled horizontally along a time dependent force f(t)i. The coefficient of static and kinetic friction between the block and the table are 0.5 and 0.25 respectively. F(t) as a function of time is shown, then find

(i) if initial velocity of the block is zero, its velocity at 4 seconds will be ?
Relevant Equations: F=ma, f=(mu)N

Here's the given F-t graph
View attachment 245621

My Attempt...
Fsmax=10N & Fk= 5N
I made equatiom F=5t-5 ( by seeing Force force and Counteracting kinetic friction)
reduced the formula to a=(5t-t)/2 wrote a=dv/dt and solved it but got wrong answer.
And since you have not shown your work, we'd just be guessing where you went wrong. The statement "wrote a=dv/dt" is NOT showing your work, it's just describing your work.
 
Shivam said:
Problem Statement: An initially stationary wooden block with a mass of 2kg is pulled horizontally along a time dependent force f(t)i. The coefficient of static and kinetic friction between the block and the table are 0.5 and 0.25 respectively. F(t) as a function of time is shown, then find

(i) if initial velocity of the block is zero, its velocity at 4 seconds will be ?
Relevant Equations: F=ma, f=(mu)N

Here's the given F-t graph
View attachment 245621

My Attempt...
Fsmax=10N & Fk= 5N
I made equatiom F=5t-5 ( by seeing Force force and Counteracting kinetic friction)
reduced the formula to a=(5t-t)/2 wrote a=dv/dt and solved it but got wrong answer.
The graph shows the applied force. Is the acceleration actually the graph shown divided by the mass? Does the block start to slide immediately after t = 0?
 
kuruman said:
The graph shows the applied force. Is the acceleration actually the graph shown divided by the mass? Does the block start to slide immediately after t = 0?
I did everything... I thought about this question for 2 hours..
I know block starts to move at t=2 sec
Also at 2 sec kinetic friction(5N) starts to act and that's why I wrote -ve5 in force equation which is reduced by kinetic friction
 
So I take it you are not going to show your work.
 
phinds said:
So I take it you are not going to show your work.
Ok..sorry I'll show...just wait a minute.
 
245627
 
phinds said:
So I take it you are not going to show your work.
I got the answer right this time ... It was calculation mistake, for all this time I thought my method was wrong... Sorry for causing trouble.
Is their is any other method can you tell me, The one you solved with

Answer is 10m/s.
 
Last edited:
Shivam, you really need to learn to use the edit button. It's a bit ridiculous to make 3 or 4 posts in a row instead of just adding to the first one.
 
  • #10
phinds said:
Shivam, you really need to learn to use the edit button. It's a bit ridiculous to make 3 or 4 posts in a row instead of just adding to the first one.
Ok..just tried the edit method... Do u have any other method to solve the problem with ?
 
  • #11
Shivam said:
Ok..just tried the edit method... Do u have any other method to solve the problem with ?
This method is the one to use because you are given the variable force as a function of time. If you were given the variable force as a function of position, then using the work-energy theorem would be more direct.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Shivam

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K