Find Voltage on Y-Axis for y>>s

  • Thread starter Thread starter Minhtran1092
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Voltage
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the expression for the electric potential on the y-axis at distances where y is much greater than s, in the context of electric potential due to point charges and quadrupoles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the voltage expression by summing contributions from multiple charges and simplifying the expression for the case where y is significantly larger than s. Some participants provide alternative formulations and suggest using binomial expansions to simplify the expressions further.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the mathematical approaches to simplify the potential expression. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of binomial expansion for approximations, and there is acknowledgment of the utility of these mathematical tools in the context of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a previous similar problem, and some participants express a desire for more foundational knowledge regarding binomial expansion, indicating a potential gap in understanding among participants.

Minhtran1092
Messages
28
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Someone posted a similar problem here: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=375737

The diagram and problem description is essentially the same except I am trying to find the expression for the electric potential on the y-axis at distances y>>s.

Homework Equations



V = U/Q; Voltage at a distance 'r' from source charge, on a point charge Q whose potential energy is given by: k(q_source charge)(Q_point charge)(1/r)

The Attempt at a Solution


To find the voltage, I figured to take the sum of the voltage at a position 'y' from the point of origin where -2q charge was. The total electrical potential at this point was given by:
ƩV = ƩU/Q_P; ƩU = k(q)(Q_P)(1/r) + k(q)(Q_P)(1/r) + k(-2q)(Q_p)(1/r); where r was (y-s), (y+s), (y), respectively. Algebraically simplifying this sum gives: 2kq(s^2)*[1/((y^3)-y(s^2))].

For y>>s, I figured the denominator would simplify to y^3-y but that wasn't the correct answer. It seems that I had trouble understanding the general procedure for evaluating a limiting case. Mathematically, how does considering when y>>s simplify the equation to kQ/(y^3); Q = 2qs^2? (The answer is correct for the x and y axis, which makes sense intuitively since at any long distance the linear electric quadrupole can be treated as a point charge whereby the calculation to find the electrical potential on any axis is arbitrary)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


well the potential on y-axis would be

[tex]V(y)=\frac{k_e q}{(y-s)}-\frac{2k_e q}{y}+\frac{k_e q}{(y+s)}[/tex]

which simplifies to

[tex]\frac{k_e q}{y}\left [\frac{1}{(1-\frac{s}{y})}-2+ \frac{1}{(1+\frac{s}{y})}\right ][/tex]

since y >> s , we have [itex]\frac{s}{y} \ll 1[/itex] we can use binomial expansions

[tex]\frac{1}{(1-\frac{s}{y})}\approx 1+\frac{s}{y}+\frac{s^2}{y^2}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{(1+\frac{s}{y})}\approx 1-\frac{s}{y} +\frac{s^2}{y^2}[/tex]

since [itex]\frac{s}{y} \ll 1[/itex] , we neglect higher order terms in [itex]\frac{s}{y}[/itex]

plug everything and I think you get what you are looking for

:approve:
 


IssacNewton said:
well the potential on y-axis would be

[tex]V(y)=\frac{k_e q}{(y-s)}-\frac{2k_e q}{y}+\frac{k_e q}{(y+s)}[/tex]

which simplifies to

[tex]\frac{k_e q}{y}\left [\frac{1}{(1-\frac{s}{y})}-2+ \frac{1}{(1+\frac{s}{y})}\right ][/tex]

since y >> s , we have [itex]\frac{s}{y} \ll 1[/itex] we can use binomial expansions

[tex]\frac{1}{(1-\frac{s}{y})}\approx 1+\frac{s}{y}+\frac{s^2}{y^2}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{(1+\frac{s}{y})}\approx 1-\frac{s}{y} +\frac{s^2}{y^2}[/tex]

since [itex]\frac{s}{y} \ll 1[/itex] , we neglect higher order terms in [itex]\frac{s}{y}[/itex]

plug everything and I think you get what you are looking for

:approve:

Ah I see. I wish my physics teacher told me about the binomial expansion ... it would have been very useful. Thank you, Isaac Newton (lol) for clarifying this approximation.
 


what text you are using... I think precalculus covers binomial expansion
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
64
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K