Find volume of this object using integrals

  • Thread starter Thread starter ananonanunes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrals Volume
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the volume of a 3D object using multiple integrals, with the final result expected to be 32/9. The original poster has attempted integration using Cartesian, cylindrical, and spherical coordinates but struggles with the limits of integration and the formulation of the area of slices in terms of z. Suggestions include using cylindrical coordinates and considering the placement of the coordinate origin, which can simplify the integral. The poster acknowledges a potential misunderstanding in their integration order and seeks clarification on the polar coordinates for the circle involved. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly setting up the limits and coordinate systems for successful integration.
ananonanunes
Messages
19
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
_
Relevant Equations
_
1685030223409.png


I am given this expression which represents an object in 3D and the goal is to determine its volume using multiple integrals.
I started by drawing what I think is the object as well as two "slices" of that object on different planes (z=2 and z=1)

1685030427777.png


I have tried using cartesian, cylindrical and spherical coorddinates but I get a final result that seems impossible to integrate. My first instinct was to try to use Cavalieri's principle but I can't find a way to write the area of each "slice" only in terms of z. I think the problem is I'm not writing the limits of integration correctly so if anyone could help me out with that, it would be much appreciated.

(Final result is supposed to be 32/9)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ananonanunes said:
Homework Statement: _
Relevant Equations: _

View attachment 327066

I am given this expression which represents an object in 3D and the goal is to determine its volume using multiple integrals.
I started by drawing what I think is the object as well as two "slices" of that object on different planes (z=2 and z=1)

View attachment 327067

I have tried using cartesian, cylindrical and spherical coordinates but I get a final result that seems impossible to integrate. My first instinct was to try to use Cavalieri's principle but I can't find a way to write the area of each "slice" only in terms of z. I think the problem is I'm not writing the limits of integration correctly so if anyone could help me out with that, it would be much appreciated.

(Final result is supposed to be 32/9)
It looks to me like cylindrical co-coordinates will work.

In what order did you do the integration, when you tried them?

Added in Edit:
Maybe not...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes ananonanunes
ananonanunes said:
I think the problem is I'm not writing the limits of integration correctly so if anyone could help me out with that, it would be much appreciated.
Can you write down the equation for the circle in polar coordinates?
 
  • Like
Likes ananonanunes
There are two options:
1) You can place the origin of the cylindrical coordinates at the origin.
(2) You can place the origin of the cylindrical coordinates at the centre of the circle x^2 + (y-1)^2 = 1.

The first of these leads to a simple integral; the other does not.
 
  • Like
Likes ananonanunes
SammyS said:
It looks to me like cylindrical co-coordinates will work.

In what order did you do the integration, when you tried them?

Added in Edit:
Maybe not...
I tried integrating first z then r then teta because i wrote z in terms of r and r in terms of teta
 
vela said:
Can you write down the equation for the circle in polar coordinates?
I think that might be where my problem was but now that I look at it again it should be something like 0≤r≤2sinθ ; 0θ≤π
 
pasmith said:
There are two options:
1) You can place the origin of the cylindrical coordinates at the origin.
(2) You can place the origin of the cylindrical coordinates at the centre of the circle x^2 + (y-1)^2 = 1.

The first of these leads to a simple integral; the other does not.
I understand what you mean, thanks for the help