Find wavelength in double slit experiment

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a double slit experiment problem where the original poster seeks to find the wavelength of light based on given parameters, including the distance between slits and the angle of the dark fringe. The subject area is optics, specifically wave interference patterns.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the formula for calculating wavelength based on the dark fringe order and angle but questions the validity of their result. Some participants discuss the implications of the wavelength being in the infrared range and whether the calculations align with typical visible light wavelengths.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the calculations and questioning the assumptions made regarding the values used. There is a recognition of potential errors in the calculations, particularly regarding the angle measurement. Some guidance has been offered regarding the correct interpretation of the formula and the importance of using degrees versus radians.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the constraints of the homework set, which specifies that the expected wavelength should fall within the visible light spectrum, raising concerns about the validity of the calculated result.

k77i
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two narrow slits are 0.4 mm apart. The dark fringe of order 5 is 1.2 degrees from the central bright fringe. What is the wavelength of the light in nm?


Homework Equations



dsin(theta) = (m +1/2)lambda
where d = distance between silts
m=order
lambda = wavelength

The Attempt at a Solution



It seems simple enough right? I converted the 0.4mm into meters and plugged all the values into the equation which gives me:

(4x10^-4)(sin1.2) = (5 + 1/2)lambda

then lambda = (4x10^-4)(sin1.2)/5.5

Since the answer i get is in meters i have to multiply it by 10^9 right? but that answer is way too big. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1523 nm is in the infrared range of the optical spectrum. Why do you think that it is too big?

ehild
 
ehild said:
1523 nm is in the infrared range of the optical spectrum. Why do you think that it is too big?

ehild

Because according to my homework set that answer's not right. The wavelengths we're using in class is visible light between 400nm and 700nm and the answer I'm getting from my calculations is in the thousands.
 
I find that your solution is correct. I obtained the same result, 1523 nm for the wavelength. You never know, sometimes homework sets/ exercises in books are not 100% fine.
 
Well ok but i didnt get 1523 nm as an answer either. Did I use a wrong equation or wrong values somewhere?
 
No, I don't think so. the distance between slits (a) multiplied by the sin of the angle given (sinQm) equals wavelength (landa) x (order). In this case, you are referring to dark fringes and the order gets a 1/2 added to it.
So a.sinqm=landa.(5+0.5)
comes out to be 1523 x 10^-9 m.
The equation is okay, but whether or not the values are wrong I can't know, you have the exercise.
 
Yes all the values I posted are exactly the ones from the exercise. I set up the equation exactly like that too. There must be something really obvious that I'm not getting. Let me do it step by step to see exactly where I'm messsing up.

dsin(angle) = lambda(m+0.5)
lambda = [dsin(angle)]/(m+0.5)
lambda = [(4*10-4)(sin1.2)]/5.5
lambda = 3.73*10^-4/5.5

This gives me lambda = 6.78 * 10^-4 m and so when I convert it to nm its definitely not 1523 nm. So exactly what's my mistake?
 
(4*10-4)(sin1.2) actually comes up to ~ 8.377 x 10^-6 which divided by 5.5 gives ~ 1.523 x 10 ^ - 6m or 1523 nm. Remember, you are working with degrees, not radians.
 
Oh wow i get it. Ya it really was something obvious after all
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
6K