Finding a change in angular velocity, with out I equation

Click For Summary
To find the new angular speed of a carousel after a person climbs aboard, conservation of angular momentum is applied. The initial angular momentum is equal to the final angular momentum, represented as I_before * ω_before = I_after * ω_after. The moment of inertia after the person climbs on is calculated by adding the person's mass times the radius squared to the initial moment of inertia. The formula for the final angular speed is ω_after = (I_before / (I_before + m_person * r^2)) * ω_before, indicating that the angular velocity decreases. This approach effectively demonstrates how angular momentum conservation dictates the system's behavior.
Shepherd7
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A playground carousel is rotating about its center. The radius of the carousel is 1.5m, its initial angular speed is 3.14 rad/s and its moment of inertia is 125 kg m^2. A 40kg person climbs onto the carousel near its outer edge. What is the angular speed of the carousel after the person climbs aboard?


Homework Equations



Krot = 1/2 I W^2
L=IW
I = intergral r^2 dm
I = Icm + Md^2
Here's the kicker we can't use the equations for the moment of inertia about a rotating disk. Can't use I = 1/2MR^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm just lost I've tried solving this problem multiple ways with different equations.
This is my last attempt

Li=Lf
IiWi = IfWf
IiWi/Wf = If

1/2 Ii Wi^2 = 1/2 If Wf^2

1/2 Ii Wi^2 = 1/2 IiWi/Wf * Wf^2

Ii Wi^2 / Ii Wi = Wf
(125 * 3.14^2) / (125*3.14) = Wf = 3.14

Am I any where close!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shepherd7 said:
Am I any where close!

It seems that you are trying to apply conservation of angular momentum as well as conservation of rotational energy. you could do both, but not at the same time, as they are redundant; the former is simpler:

L_\mathrm{before}=L_\mathrm{after}=L

so

I_\mathrm{before}\omega_\mathrm{before}=I_\mathrm{after}\omega_\mathrm{after}

as you stated, yourself. To complete the argument however, you need to know the moment of inertial after the person gets on. Fortunately, that is a simple matter if you assume the person to be a point mass:

I_\mathrm{after}=I_\mathrm{before}+m_\mathrm{person}r^2

putting is together:

I_\mathrm{before}\omega_\mathrm{before}=\left(I_\mathrm{before}+m_\mathrm{person}r^2\right)\omega_\mathrm{after}

or

\omega_\mathrm{after}=\frac{I_\mathrm{before}}{I_\mathrm{before}+m_\mathrm{person}r^2}\omega_\mathrm{before}

As this qoutient is less than one, the angular velocity will decrease to conserve the angular momentum.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
3K