Finding a logical formula (wff) for an englsh expression

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on finding a logical formula that expresses the condition "there are exactly two values of x for which P(x) is true." The proposed formula is (∃x)(∃y)(∀z)(P(x) ∧ P(y) ∧ P(z) → (x=z ∨ y=z) ∧ x≠y). Participants are evaluating the validity of this formula in capturing the intended meaning. The conversation emphasizes the need for precision in logical expressions to accurately reflect the specified condition. The formula aims to ensure that only two distinct values satisfy the predicate P.
Syrus
Messages
213
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose P(x) is a statement with a free variable x. Find a formula, using logical symbols, that means "there are exactly two values of x for which P(x) is true."


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution




(∃x)(∃y)(∀z)(P(x) ∧ P(y) ∧ P(z) → ( x=z ∨ y=z) ∧ x≠y)

Is this valid?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K