Finding a Minimum Value for k in an Epsilon-Delta Proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter sakodo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding a minimum value for k in the context of an epsilon-delta proof related to limits, specifically evaluating the limit of a rational function as x approaches infinity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss manipulating inequalities derived from the limit expression to isolate k. There are attempts to clarify the conditions under which k can be determined, particularly in relation to epsilon. Some participants question the feasibility of obtaining a minimum value for k and explore boundary cases.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing with various interpretations of the inequalities being explored. Some participants have provided insights into how to derive k based on the established inequalities, while others are questioning the assumptions made in the reasoning process.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the relationship between k and epsilon, with discussions about the implications of different values of epsilon on the determination of k. Participants are also considering the constraints of the problem and the nature of the inequalities involved.

sakodo
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hey guys here's the problem,

Homework Statement



lim (4x^2+9) / (3x^2 +5) = 4/3
x->infinity

find k, such that x> k/sqrt(epsilon) guarantees abs((4x^2+9) / (3x^2 +5) - 4/3) < epsilon

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



By removing the absolute sign and making the denominator common, we get

7 / (9x^2 + 15) < epsilon

keep solving we get

x > 1/3 sqrt(7/epsilon - 15)

Here is where I got stuck. How do we find k as a constant? 15 is inside the square root and if we want to make the whole thing as a fraction we would get x > 1/3 sqrt((7-15*epsilon)/epsilon). I can't just get rid of 15 either because that would screw up the inequality and I am meant to find the MINIMUM value of k. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As you said,

[tex]\frac{4x^2 + 9}{3x^2 + 5} - \frac{4}{3} = \frac{7}{9x^2 + 15}[/tex]

This is positive for all [itex]x[/itex] so we only need to worry about the upper bound. We have

[tex]\frac{7}{9x^2 + 15} < \epsilon[/tex]

iff

[tex]7 < 9x^2 \epsilon + 15 \epsilon[/tex]

iff

[tex]9x^2 > \frac{7 - 15\epsilon}{\epsilon}[/tex]

iff

[tex]9 x^2 > \frac{7}{\epsilon} - 15[/tex]

Therefore the following is certainly sufficient:

[tex]9x^2 > \frac{7}{\epsilon}[/tex]

i.e. if [itex]x[/itex] satisfies this inequality, then it satisfies all the ones above. It should be easy to find a suitable [itex]k[/itex] now. (Note that the problem didn't ask you to find the smallest possible [itex]k[/itex], just any [itex]k[/itex] that works.)
 
Thanks for the reply jbunnii.

Yeah I get your working. Just a side question, is it then impossible to obtain a minimum value of k?

Cheers.
 
sakodo said:
Thanks for the reply jbunnii.

Yeah I get your working. Just a side question, is it then impossible to obtain a minimum value of k?

Cheers.

OK, go back to

[tex]9x^2 > \frac{7}{\epsilon} - 15[/tex]

If this were an equality instead of an inequality, then we would have a "boundary case" where [itex]x[/itex] just barely fails, but any larger [itex]x[/itex] would pass. Let's investigate this boundary case:

[tex]9x^2 = \frac{7}{\epsilon} - 15[/tex]

Let's also set [itex]x[/itex] to the minimum allowed:

[tex]x = \frac{k}{\sqrt{\epsilon}}[/tex]

and substitute this into the boundary case:

[tex]\frac{9k^2}{\epsilon} = \frac{7}{\epsilon} - 15[/tex]

or equivalently

[tex]9k^2 = 7 - 15\epsilon[/tex]

Then we have

[tex]k = \frac{1}{3}\sqrt{7 - 15\epsilon}[/tex]

assuming [itex]\epsilon[/itex] is small enough that we can take the square root.

I think this [itex]k[/itex] is the smallest possible, if [itex]k[/itex] is allowed to depend on [itex]\epsilon[/itex].

From this we can see that the smallest [itex]k[/itex] that works for ALL [itex]\epsilon[/itex] is

[tex]k = \frac{1}{3}\sqrt{7}[/tex]

which is the same answer as before.
 
Last edited:
Hey man thanks again. However I just realized if 9x^2 > 7/epsilon -15, then how can we assume 9x^2 > 7/epsilon? if a > b -c we can't just say a > b can we? grr this is annoying lol...
 
sakodo said:
Hey man thanks again. However I just realized if 9x^2 > 7/epsilon -15, then how can we assume 9x^2 > 7/epsilon? if a > b -c we can't just say a > b can we? grr this is annoying lol...

No, you have the logic in reverse.

I established that we need AT LEAST 9x^2 > 7/epsilon - 15. But if we achieve 9x^2 > 7/epsilon, that's even better, right? So I found k to satisfy 9x^2 > 7/epsilon, and therefore it also satisfies 9x^2 > 7/epsilon - 15.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K