Finding a Nonzero 3x3 Matrix A Such That Ax is Perpendicular to [1,2,3]

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A nonzero 3x3 matrix A can be constructed such that the product Ax is perpendicular to the vector [1, 2, 3] for all x in R3. The key approach involves ensuring that all columns of matrix A are perpendicular to [1, 2, 3]. A specific example of a perpendicular vector is [-2, 1, 0]. The discussion emphasizes that the set of vectors perpendicular to [1, 2, 3] forms a plane through the origin, which can be utilized to define the matrix A.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector operations in R3
  • Knowledge of matrix multiplication
  • Familiarity with the concept of perpendicular vectors
  • Basic linear algebra concepts, including vector subspaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Research how to construct projection operators in linear algebra
  • Learn about the properties of vector subspaces and their bases
  • Explore the concept of linear independence in vector spaces
  • Study the implications of determinants in matrix theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and anyone interested in understanding matrix operations and vector relationships in R3.

skyflashings
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Find a nonzero 3x3 matrix A such that Ax is perpendicular to [1,2,3] for all x in R3

A vector perpendicular to [1, 2, 3] could be, say, [-2, 1, 0]. But what would be a general approach to finding a solution that would satisfy all x? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what definition of perpendicular are you using?
 
skyflashings said:
Find a nonzero 3x3 matrix A such that Ax is perpendicular to [1,2,3] for all x in R3

A vector perpendicular to [1, 2, 3] could be, say, [-2, 1, 0]. But what would be a general approach to finding a solution that would satisfy all x? Thanks!
[-2, 1, 0] is perpendicular to [1, 2, 3]. However there are many others which are perpendicular to [1, 2, 3] and are also linearly independent of [-2, 1, 0] .

I suppose you need to take the scalar product of Ax and [-2, 1, 0] and set it to zero.
 
SammyS said:
[-2, 1, 0] is perpendicular to [1, 2, 3]. However there are many others which are perpendicular to [1, 2, 3] and are also linearly independent of [-2, 1, 0] .

I suppose you need to take the scalar product of Ax and [-2, 1, 0] and set it to zero.

If \vec{x} = (x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n)^T and A has columns \vec{v}_1, \ldots, \vec{v}_n, then
A \vec{x} = x_1 \vec{v}_1 + x_2 \vec{v}_2 + \cdots + x_n \vec{v}_n. Since you want this to be perpendicular to [1,2,3] for all x, all the vectors \vec{v}_i must be perpendicular to [1,2,3].

PS: Does anyone know how to get the "\boldmath" command to work in the version of tex used here?

RGV
 
i don't think such an A can be found whose determinant is non-zero.

therefore, one may choose some of the columns of A to be 0 columns, which makes the problem rather simple.
 
Ray Vickson said:
PS: Does anyone know how to get the "\boldmath" command to work in the version of tex used here?

\textbf{A}
does \textbf{} help?
 
the set of vectors perpindicular to (1,2,3)^T will form a plane through the origin, in fact they form a vector subspace

If you could find an operator that maps any vector onto that plane, then you would have a suitable operator...
 
lanedance said:
\textbf{A}
does \textbf{} help?

Let's try it: \textbf{A}. So, yes, it works. Thank you.

RGV
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
883
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K