Finding a Quadratic Factor of z⁴+16

  • Thread starter Thread starter XtremePhysX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quadratic
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
35 replies · 6K views
XtremePhysX
Messages
92
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find a real quadratic factor of the polynomial:

Homework Equations



[tex]z^{4}+16=0[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know :$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are a couple of ways of solving this problem.

If you want to solve it using complex numbers, then you need to find all the complex roots of [itex]z^4=-16[/itex] by converting -16 into mod-arg form.

If you want to solve it without, you'll instead be solving a system of equations to find the value of some unknown variables.
 
Thank you guys.
-16 = 16cis(pi)
where do I go from there?
 
XtremePhysX said:
Thank you guys.
-16 = 16cis(pi)
where do I go from there?

So [itex]z^4=16cis(\pi)[/itex]

What does z equal to then?
 
Hmm sorry, My previous links was not that helpful.
I think you might just want to solve it 'as it comes' by factorizing.
z⁴+16=0 -> (z²)²-(4i)²=0
so (z²-4i)(z²+4i)=0 ... (do the same trick once more and you will get your 4 roots easily)
Cheers...
 
XtremePhysX said:
Thank you guys.
-16 = 16cis(pi)
where do I go from there?

The best way to solve it with complex numbers is to find the 4 complex roots.

1. Note that the roots can be grouped as pairs of complex conjugates.

2. We know that both the sum and product of complex conjugates are real numbers.

3. Use the relationship between the sum and product of the roots and the coefficients of a quadratic to find the factor.
 
so I got (z^2+4i)(z^2-4i)

can I split that into linear factors?
 
XtremePhysX said:
so I got (z^2+4i)(z^2-4i)

can I split that into linear factors?

yes, (z2-4i)=(z-2√(i))((z+2√(i)), and (z^2+4i)=(z-2√(-i))((z+2√(-i))...What is √i?

ehild
 
Have you solved the problem? What is the solution?

The more elegant method would have been to use the complex roots of -16, which are zk=2 cis[pi/4+k(2pi/4)], (k=0,1,2,3) and write z4=(z-2cis(pi/4))((z-2cis(3pi/4))((z-2cis(5pi/4))((z-2cis(7pi/4)). The product of the first and last factors is real and so is the product of the second and third ones.

ehild
 
ehild said:
Have you solved the problem? What is the solution?

The more elegant method would have been to use the complex roots of -16, which are zk=2 cis[pi/4+k(2pi/4)], (k=0,1,2,3) and write z4=(z-2cis(pi/4))((z-2cis(3pi/4))((z-2cis(5pi/4))((z-2cis(7pi/4)). The product of the first and last factors is real and so is the product of the second and third ones.

ehild

The question says this: Find a real quadratic factor of the polynomial [tex]z^{4}+16=0[/tex]
Does that mean the factors can't be imaginary, I'm a bit confused here.
 
XtremePhysX said:
The question says this: Find a real quadratic factor of the polynomial [tex]z^{4}+16=0[/tex]
Does that mean the factors can't be imaginary, I'm a bit confused here.

No, real quadratic factors are factors that are quadratic (of the form [itex]ax^2+bx+c[/itex]) where a,b,c are all real (not complex) coefficients.
All real quadratics with complex roots (or complex linear factors) have their roots that come in complex conjugate pairs, so that means that if we have two complex conjugate linear factors, say, [itex](x-(a+ib))[/itex] and [itex](x-(a-ib))[/itex] then we can always multiply them together to get back to a real quadratic.
 
[tex]\left [ z+(2 (-1)^{1/4}) \right ] \left [ z-(2 (-1)^{1/4}) \right ] \left [ z+(2 (-1)^{3/4}) \right ] \left [ z-(2 (-1)^{3/4}) \right ][/tex]

So this is the solution.
 
XtremePhysX said:
[tex]\left [ z+(2 (-1)^{1/4}) \right ] \left [ z-(2 (-1)^{1/4}) \right ] \left [ z+(2 (-1)^{3/4}) \right ] \left [ z-(2 (-1)^{3/4}) \right ][/tex]

So this is the solution.

Can you instead write the roots in standard form (a + bi)? ehild almost gave them to you when he said that the roots were cis(π/4), cis(3π/4), cis(5π/4), and cis(7π/4).
 
XtremePhysX said:
[tex]\left [ z+(2 (-1)^{1/4}) \right ] \left [ z-(2 (-1)^{1/4}) \right ] \left [ z+(2 (-1)^{3/4}) \right ] \left [ z-(2 (-1)^{3/4}) \right ][/tex]

So this is the solution.

Nowhere near. Those are linear factors, and they're not real factors either.
The question asks you to convert these complex linear factors into real quadratic factors.

Start by answering these:

[tex]cis(\pi/4)+cis(-\pi/4)=?[/tex]

[tex]cis(\pi/4)cis(-\pi/4)=?[/tex]
 
Not yet, you can not use complex numbers. So substitute the roots of -1 in the form a+bi. Then multiply two factors which are complex conjugate to each other to eliminate the imaginary parts.
You know that √(-1)=±i. What is √i? What are the complex numbers which squares are i?

(hint: try cos(pi/4)+isin(pi/4))ehild
 
Mentallic said:
Nowhere near. Those are linear factors, and they're not real factors either.
The question asks you to convert these complex linear factors into real quadratic factors.

Start by answering these:

[tex]cis(\pi/4)+cis(-\pi/4)=?[/tex]

[tex]cis(\pi/4)cis(-\pi/4)=?[/tex]

[tex]cis(\pi/4)+cis(-\pi/4)=\sqrt{2}[/tex]
[tex]cis(\pi/4)cis(-\pi/4)=1[/tex]
 
Protip: The square root of i can be derived from Euler's formula as follows: [itex]e^{i\pi}=-1[/itex], so it follows that [itex]e^{i\pi/4}=\sqrt{i}[/itex]. However, we can convert this to the standard form using Euler's formula once again: [itex]e^{i\pi/4}=\cos(\pi/4)+i\sin(\pi/4)=\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}+\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}i[/itex]
Using the same logic but instead using [itex]e^{-i\pi}=-1[/itex], one obtains the other square root of i.
Now plug these in and simplify!
 
ehild said:
Not yet, you can not use complex numbers. So substitute the roots of -1 in the form a+bi. Then multiply two factors which are complex conjugate to each other to eliminate the imaginary parts.
You know that √(-1)=±i. What is √i? What are the complex numbers which squares are i?

(hint: try cos(pi/4)+isin(pi/4))ehild

Isn't √i either:
[tex]e^{\frac{i\pi }{4}}[/tex]
or [tex]cis(\frac{\pi }{4})[/tex]
 
XtremePhysX said:
Isn't √i either:
[tex]e^{\frac{i\pi }{4}}[/tex]
or [tex]cis(\frac{\pi }{4})[/tex]
Yes, but what is it in numerical form, a+bi without cis and pi?
The linear factors of z4+16 can be written in the form (z-2(a+bi))=z-2a-2bi. Find all these factors.

ehild
 
uart said:
The best way to solve it with complex numbers is to find the 4 complex roots.

1. Note that the roots can be grouped as pairs of complex conjugates.

2. We know that both the sum and product of complex conjugates are real numbers.

3. Use the relationship between the sum and product of the roots and the coefficients of a quadratic to find the factor.

Hi XtremePhysX. I posted step by step instructions of the easiest way to do this in my previous post. If you're unsure of any of the steps just ask. :smile:

You can get the 4 complex roots like this:

[tex]z^4 = 16 e^{i(\pi + 2k \pi)}[/tex]

[tex]z = 2 e^{i(\frac{\pi}{4} + \frac{k \pi}{2})}[/tex]

Substituting any 4 consecutive integers for k (eg k=-2,-1,0,1) gives,

[tex]z_1 = 2 e^{\frac{-3i\pi}{4}}[/tex]

[tex]z_2 = 2 e^{\frac{-i\pi}{4}}[/tex]

[tex]z_3 = 2 e^{\frac{i\pi}{4}}[/tex]

[tex]z_4 = 2 e^{\frac{3i\pi}{4}}[/tex]

Now just follow the steps given above.
 
Last edited:
XtremePhysX said:
[tex]cis(\pi/4)+cis(-\pi/4)=\sqrt{2}[/tex]
[tex]cis(\pi/4)cis(-\pi/4)=1[/tex]

Right, and I see that many others here have explained what the roots of z4+16=0 are, so we will move onto the next step.

Since [itex]cis(\pi/4)[/itex] and its conjugate pair [itex]cis(-\pi/4)[/itex] as well as [itex]cis(3\pi/4)[/itex] and its conjugate pair [itex]cis(-3\pi/4)[/itex] are all roots of the quartic, we can express it as follows:

[tex]z^4+16=(z-cis(\pi/4))(z-cis(-\pi/4))(z-cis(3\pi/4))(z-cis(-3\pi/4))[/tex]

Now, expand [itex](z-cis(\pi/4))(z-cis(-\pi/4))[/itex] and use the results you've posted to turn it into a real quadratic factor.
Then do the same for [itex](z-cis(3\pi/4))(z-cis(-3\pi/4))[/itex] and you're done :smile:
 
[tex]z^{2}+2z\sqrt{2}+4[/tex]
 
XtremePhysX said:
[tex]z^{2}+2z\sqrt{2}+4[/tex]

The question says a real quadratic factor so I though that implies there should be only 1 factor. Isn't that right?
 
XtremePhysX said:
The question says a real quadratic factor so I though that implies there should be only 1 factor. Isn't that right?

Yes you're right, but I don't understand why they'd make you stop there.