MHB Finding a set of vectors that span u,v....

  • Thread starter Thread starter shamieh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set Span Vectors
shamieh
Messages
538
Reaction score
0
Find a set of vectors {u, v} in $\mathbb{R}^4$ that spans the solution set of the equations:

$x - y + 2z - 2w = 0$

$2x + 2y -z + 3w = 0$

($u$ and $v$ are both $4 \times 1$)
$u = ?$, $v = ?$

I put the matrix in RREF to get

$\begin{bmatrix}1&0&3/4&-1/4\\0&1&-5/4&7/4\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}0\\0\end{bmatrix}$

Then I got $x = -\frac{3}{4} z + \frac{1}{4} w$ and $y = \frac{5}{4} z - \frac{7}{4} w$

But I'm not sure how to present the answer as they want it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have what are called "two free variables" (in this case, $z$ and $w$, which must be known to even calculate what $x$ and $y$ are).

Let's write the solutions in a slightly different way, we have:

$4x = -3z + w$
$4y = 5z - 7w$

so we can write $4(x,y,z,w) = (4x,4y,4z,4w) = (-3z+w,5z-7w,4z,4w) = z(-3,5,4,0) + w(1,-7,0,4)$

Maybe this will give you a hint.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top