lucasLima
- 17
- 0
Hi Guys, that's what i got
<x,z>=<y,z>
<x,z>-<y,z>=0
<x,z>+<-y,z>=0
<x-y,z>=0
x-y = [0,2,0]
<2*[0,1,0],Z>=0
2<[0,1,0],z> = 0
<[0,1,0],z>=0
So 'im stuck at that. Any ideas?
The discussion revolves around finding all vectors \( z \) such that the inner products \( \langle x, z \rangle = \langle y, z \rangle = 0 \) hold true. Participants explore the implications of these conditions in the context of vector algebra and inner products, with a focus on the geometric interpretation of perpendicularity in Euclidean space.
Participants express various approaches to the problem, with no consensus on a single solution or method. Different interpretations of the conditions and the form of \( z \) are presented, indicating multiple competing views.
Some participants note the importance of the inner product notation and its implications for the geometric interpretation of the vectors involved. There is also mention of the need to clarify the components of \( z \) and how they relate to the conditions set by \( x \) and \( y \).
If you write z with its components, what do you get as result?lucasLima said:<[0,1,0],z>=0
mfb said:If you write z with its components, what do you get as result?
Unrelated:
You didn't use the "=0" part yet.
mfb said:Well, it is the first part of the solution, yes.
One thing I don't see mentioned in this thread is that the notation <x, z> represents the inner product of x and z, I believe. If z is an arbitrary vector with z = <z1, z2, z3>, then <x, z> = 0 means that x and z are perpendicular. Also, <x, z> = ##x_1z_1 + x_2z_2 + x_3z_3 = z_1 + z_2 + z_3##, and similarly for <y, z>.lucasLima said:![]()
Hi Guys, that's what i got
<x,z>=<y,z>
<x,z>-<y,z>=0
<x,z>+<-y,z>=0
<x-y,z>=0
x-y = [0,2,0]
<2*[0,1,0],Z>=0
2<[0,1,0],z> = 0
<[0,1,0],z>=0
So 'im stuck at that. Any ideas?