Finding Analagous Electric Circuit for Mass Spring Damper System Homework

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 3K views
Messages
2,076
Reaction score
140

Homework Statement



Find the analogous electrical circuit for the following mass spring damper system.

Screen Shot 2015-11-19 at 7.47.55 PM.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I am rusty with writing equations of motion. I wanted to see if someone could check my work.

Looking at the diagram, there are three equations to write. Also there should be a third displacement variable, call it ##x_3##, between ##k_3## and ##b##. Assume down is positive.

For mass ##m_1##:

$$m_1x'' = -k_1x_1 + k_2(x_2 - x_1) + k_3(x_3 - x_1) + b(x_2' - x_3') + p(t)$$

For mass ##m_2##:

$$m_2x'' = -k_2(x_2 - x_1) - b(x_2' - x_3') - k_3(x_3 - x_1)$$

At the node in between the damper and spring:

$$0 = -k_3(x_3 - x_1) + b(x_2' - x_3')$$

Do these look okay?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You do realize that you can draw an analogous electrical circuit for the mechanical system without writing and solving the differential equations, right?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: whitsona
gneill said:
You do realize that you can draw an analogous electrical circuit for the mechanical system without writing and solving the differential equations, right?

Yes this is possible, but I was hoping to understand how to write the equations of motion anyway. It would be nice to know how to write them for a more complicated system, so I would still like to know if I've done that properly.

I'll give your idea a try though. Here is my attempt:

724aff635db084cf0a586208cb8528bc.png


The battery on the far right corresponds to ##p(t)##.
 
Yes, your figure looks okay to me. You've chosen the Force ⇒ Voltage paradigm. You could also have used the Force ⇒ Current paradigm where masses become capacitors rather than inductors.

For your equations, at a glance they look fine except I don't see where you've accounted for gravity acting on the masses.
 
gneill said:
Yes, your figure looks okay to me. You've chosen the Force ⇒ Voltage paradigm. You could also have used the Force ⇒ Current paradigm where masses become capacitors rather than inductors.

Okay.

gneill said:
For your equations, at a glance they look fine except I don't see where you've accounted for gravity acting on the masses.

Yeah I find this weird because in my textbook they never seem to account for the force of gravity on a mass.

They compensate for this by making a substitution like so:

Screen Shot 2015-11-20 at 10.01.05 AM.png

Screen Shot 2015-11-20 at 10.01.13 AM.png
 
Ah, I see. Yes, that substitution works and makes the math simpler. Of course, to match the model's predicted position to a real-world position one would need to know the equilibrium position's offset in real-world coordinates.