Finding Angular Velocity in Rotational Motion Problems

AI Thread Summary
To find angular velocity in rotational motion problems, converting 53 rpm to radians per second yields 5.55 rad/sec, which can be further multiplied by 2π to get approximately 34.87 rad/sec. The discussion emphasizes that this is primarily a conversion problem, and mass is not relevant to the calculation of angular velocity. Participants highlight the importance of understanding unit conversions and the specific requirements of the problem. There is a concern about the accuracy of the final answer, indicating potential confusion in the calculations. Overall, the focus is on mastering conversion techniques for solving similar rotational motion problems.
momoneedsphysicshelp
Messages
23
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
A ball, 1.8 kg, is attached to the end of a rope and spun in a horizontal circle above a student's head. As the student rotates the ball in a horizontal clockwise circle their lab partner counts 53 rotations in one minute. What is the ball's angular velocity in radians per second?
Relevant Equations
1 rad/sec = 60/2pi rmp
53 rpm equals 5.55 rad/sec
multiply 5.55 by 2pi to get angular velocity of 34.8717

Is the answer 34.8717?

What should I have done to more accurately solve the problem with a better understanding?

What other steps should I take when solving similar problems?

and lastly,
Is the mass relevant to the problem in any way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
momoneedsphysicshelp said:
53 rpm equals 5.55 rad/sec
Right. Why continue past that? You are asked for it in units of rad/sec.
 
momoneedsphysicshelp said:
Is the mass relevant to the problem in any way?
No.
 
  • Like
Likes momoneedsphysicshelp
haruspex said:
Right. Why continue past that? You are asked for it in units of rad/sec.
So this is only a conversion problem?
Thanks you very much.
 
When I turned in that answer, it was still wrong.
 
What answer ?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top