Finding Area with Double Integrals: What is the Approach for This Homework?

Click For Summary
To find the area using double integrals, the total area is initially calculated as π16, from which the unshaded region's area is subtracted. The unshaded area is determined using rectangular coordinates with bounds from -2 to 2 for x, and the limits for y defined by the larger circle's equation, sqrt(16-x^2) and -sqrt(16-x^2). The integrand for area calculations is typically assumed to be 1, as it represents the unit area being integrated. This approach aligns with the principle that the number of integrals corresponds to the exponent of the units being calculated. Understanding these concepts is crucial for correctly applying double integrals in area calculations.
catch22
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


upload_2015-12-4_6-20-17.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


here is my approach,

I take the whole area, which is π16

then subtract the unshaded region

now to find the unshaded region's area, I use rectangular coordinates.

my bounds are from -2 to 2 for x and the the top and bottom of the larger circle : sqrt (16-x^2) and -sqrt (16-x^2)

but now I don't know if there should be an integrand or assume it is 1 if none is given?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you integrate for area, the integrand is 1.
 
  • Like
Likes catch22
Here's how I like to think of it. If the amount of integrals that you're doing is the same as the exponent on your units would be, then the integrand is 1. For example, if you're calculating an area, your units would be square units (exponent 2), so with a double integral the integrand is one. So if you're calculating a volume, with a triple integral your integrand is 1 but with a double integral it isn't.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K