Finding (C): Halfway Between Equilibrium and End Point

  • Thread starter Thread starter hidemi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium Point
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the motion between points A and B in simple harmonic motion, particularly finding the time for specific segments of the motion. It establishes that the time intervals T_OB, T_BO, T_OA, and T_AO are equal to T/4 due to the symmetry of the sine curve. The method proposed for calculating the time T_QB involves first determining T_OQ and then subtracting it from T_OB. The position of point Q is identified as x = A/2, leading to a sine equation to solve for T_OQ. The conversation concludes with a participant expressing satisfaction with the solution provided.
hidemi
Messages
206
Reaction score
36
Homework Statement
A particle is in simple harmonic motion with period T. At time t = 0 it is halfway
between the equilibrium point and an end point of its motion, traveling toward the
end point. The next time it is at the same place is:
A. t =T
B. t =T/2
C. t =T/3
D. t = T/4
E. none of the above

The answer is C
Relevant Equations
X = A cos(wt+c)
I think (D) is correct since it is half way between the equilibrium point and and the end point of its motion, it is a quarter of the total distance. How to get (C)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think t=T is ,though not least, the time it is in the same place. B to D are inappropriate because halfway means anywhere between the top and the bottom.
 
can you find the angle between ##t_{1}## and ##t_{2}##
time.jpg
 
Suppose the motion is between points A and B:

A P O Q B

The centre is O , the end points are A and B.
P is the midpoint of AO.
Q is the midpoint of OB.

Say we want the time for Q→B→Q.

The following times are equal:
##T_{OB} = T_{BO} = T_{OA} = T_{AO} = \frac T 4##
This a due to the inherent symmetry in a cycle of simple harmonic motion. It can be seen by looking at the shape of a sine curve.

But ##T_{AP}, T_{PO}##, etc. are not equal to any 'obvious' value (not ##\frac T 8## for example). Look at a sine curve carefully.

With O at x=0, taking x=0 when t=0 and assuming velocity at t=0 is positive, we can describe the motion by:$$x(t) = Asin \left[ \left( \frac {2\pi} T \right) t \right]$$(Using sine rather than cosine is most convenient here.)

Suppose we want ##T_{QB}##. (The required ‘return time' will be twice this.)

I think the simplest method to find ##T_{QB}## is first to find ##T_{OQ}## and then subtract it from ##T_{OB}## (since we already know that ##T_{OB} =\frac T 4##).

The position of Q is x = ##\frac A 2## which gives:$$\frac A 2 = Asin \left[ \left( \frac {2\pi} T \right) T_{OQ} \right]$$Solve for ##T_{OQ}##. And take it from there.

Someone might post a simpler method, but the above method is easier than it might initially appear!
 
Last edited:
Steve4Physics said:
Suppose the motion is between points A and B:

A P O Q B

The centre is O , the end points are A and B.
P is the midpoint of AO.
Q is the midpoint of OB.

Say we want the time for Q→B→Q.

The following times are equal:
##T_{OB} = T_{BO} = T_{OA} = T_{AO} = \frac T 4##
This a due to the inherent symmetry in a cycle of simple harmonic motion. It can be seen by looking at the shape of a sine curve.

But ##T_{AP}, T_{PO}##, etc. are not equal to any 'obvious' value (not ##\frac T 8## for example). Look at a sine curve carefully.

With O at x=0, taking x=0 when t=0 and assuming velocity at t=0 is positive, we can describe the motion by:$$x(t) = Asin \left[ \left( \frac {2\pi} T \right) t \right]$$(Using sine rather than cosine is most convenient here.)

Suppose we want ##T_{QB}##. (The required ‘return time' will be twice this.)

I think the simplest method to find ##T_{QB}## is first to find ##T_{OQ}## and then subtract it from ##T_{OB}## (since we already know that ##T_{OB} =\frac T 4##).

The position of Q is x = ##\frac A 2## which gives:$$\frac A 2 = Asin \left[ \left( \frac {2\pi} T \right) T_{OQ} \right]$$Solve for ##T_{OQ}##. And take it from there.

Someone might post a simpler method, but the above method is easier than it might initially appear!
I got it! Thanks so much!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top