Finding CDF of a Continuous R.V.

  • Thread starter Thread starter gajohnson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cdf Continuous
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the cumulative distribution function (CDF) for the given probability density function (PDF) f(x) = (1 + cx)/2 for x in the interval [-1, 1]. The user initially miscalculated the CDF and received guidance on correctly integrating the PDF to derive the CDF, which should be F(x) = (x + 1)/2 + (c/4)(x^2 - 1) for -1 ≤ x ≤ 1, with F(x) = 0 for x < -1 and F(x) = 1 for x > 1. There was confusion about the limits of the CDF and the role of the parameter c in determining the distribution's characteristics. Ultimately, the user clarified the correct form of the CDF and expressed gratitude for the assistance received.
gajohnson
Messages
70
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let
f(x) = (1 + cx)/2 for x between -1 and 1 and f(x)=0 otherwise, where c is between -1 and 1. Show that f is a density and find the corresponding cdf. Find the quartiles and the median of the distribution in terms c.

Homework Equations



NA

The Attempt at a Solution



I simply showed that this was a density by integrating f(x) from -1 to 1 and showing that this is 1.

For the second part of the problem, I found the CDF to be F(x) = 1/2(x+(cx^2)/2) for -1≤x≤1.
Clearly, F(x) = 0 for -1<x. However, is F(x) = 1 for x>1?

In addition, I am having trouble properly interpreting the directions for finding the quartiles and median. Should my answer be a function of c? If so, how do I go about getting there? Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
gajohnson said:

Homework Statement



Let
f(x) = (1 + cx)/2 for x between -1 and 1 and f(x)=0 otherwise, where c is between -1 and 1. Show that f is a density and find the corresponding cdf. Find the quartiles and the median of the distribution in terms c.

Homework Equations



NA

The Attempt at a Solution



I simply showed that this was a density by integrating f(x) from -1 to 1 and showing that this is 1.

For the second part of the problem, I found the CDF to be F(x) = 1/2(x+(cx^2)/2) for -1≤x≤1.
Clearly, F(x) = 0 for -1<x. However, is F(x) = 1 for x>1?

In addition, I am having trouble properly interpreting the directions for finding the quartiles and median. Should my answer be a function of c? If so, how do I go about getting there? Thank you!

Your CDF is wrong. For ##x<-1, F(x) = \int_{-\infty}^x 0\, dx = 0##. For ##x## bewteen -1 and 1, you should be calculating$$
F(x) = \int_{-\infty}^x f(x)\, dx =\int_{-\infty}^{-1} 0\, dx +
\int_{-1}^x \frac {1+cx} 2\, dx$$Now do you see what to do for ##x>1##?
 
Last edited:
LCKurtz said:
Your CDF is wrong. For ##x<-1, F(x) = \int_{-\infty}^x 0\, dx = 0##. For ##x## bewteen -1 and 1, you should be calculating$$
F(x) = \int_{-\infty}^x f(x)\, dx =\int_{-\infty}^{-1} 0\, dx +
\int_{-1}^x \frac 1 2 (x + \frac{cx^2}{2})\, dx$$Now do you see what to do for ##x>1##?

Thanks for your response! Why would I be taking the integral of 1/2(x+(cx^2)/2) to find the CDF, and not the integral of (1+cx)/2, which is my density function?
 
gajohnson said:
Thanks for your response! Why would I be taking the integral of 1/2(x+(cx^2)/2) to find the CDF, and not the integral of (1+cx)/2, which is my density function?

You shouldn't, of course. My eyes fell on the wrong function while typing. I will correct it.
 
LCKurtz said:
You shouldn't, of course. My eyes fell on the wrong function while typing. I will correct it.

Got it. Thanks!

Do you have any suggestions on the quartiles and medians?
 
gajohnson said:
Thanks for your response! Why would I be taking the integral of 1/2(x+(cx^2)/2) to find the CDF, and not the integral of (1+cx)/2, which is my density function?

Despite that observation, your cdf is still wrong.
F(x) = \frac{1}{2} \int_{-1}^x 1 \, dt + \frac{1}{2} \int_{-1}^x c t \, dt, \:<br /> -1 \leq x \leq 1. This will = 0 at x = -1 and = 1 at x = 1, no matter what is the value of c.

To get a 100p percentile, solve the quadratic equation F(x) = p.
 
Ray Vickson said:
Despite that observation, your cdf is still wrong.
F(x) = \frac{1}{2} \int_{-1}^x 1 \, dt + \frac{1}{2} \int_{-1}^x c t \, dt, \:<br /> -1 \leq x \leq 1. This will = 0 at x = -1 and = 1 at x = 1, no matter what is the value of c.

To get a 100p percentile, solve the quadratic equation F(x) = p.

I am not entirely sure where my CDF is wrong or what you mean about c.
Currently my CDF is as follows:

P(X≤x) = 1/2(x+(cx^2)/2) if -1≤x≤1
0 if x < -1
1 if x > 1

1/2(x+(cx^2)/2) was found by taking exactly the integral that you described.

Do you mean instead that it should be:

P(X≤x) = 1/2(x+(cx^2)/2) if -1<x<1
0 if x ≤ -1
1 if x ≥ 1

Thank you!
 
gajohnson said:
I am not entirely sure where my CDF is wrong or what you mean about c.
Currently my CDF is as follows:

P(X≤x) = 1/2(x+(cx^2)/2) if -1≤x≤1
0 if x < -1
1 if x > 1

1/2(x+(cx^2)/2) was found by taking exactly the integral that you described.

Do you mean instead that it should be:

P(X≤x) = 1/2(x+(cx^2)/2) if -1<x<1
0 if x ≤ -1
1 if x ≥ 1

Thank you!

Do either of the above formulas give ##\lim_{x \downarrow -1} P(X \leq x) = 0## and ##\lim_{x \uparrow 1} P(X \leq x) = 1?## Since X is continuous, these must happen.
 
gajohnson: don't confuse integral and antiderivate. For instance, try to compute the value of your CDF


F\left ( x \right ) = \frac{1}{2}\left ( x + \frac{cx^2}{2} \right )

for x=-1. Is it what you expected?

The parameter c will govern "how fast" your CDF climbs. Here is a graph of it between -1 and 1, for various values of c.
 

Attachments

  • cdf.png
    cdf.png
    22.7 KB · Views: 762
  • #10
jfgobin said:
gajohnson: don't confuse integral and antiderivate. For instance, try to compute the value of your CDF


F\left ( x \right ) = \frac{1}{2}\left ( x + \frac{cx^2}{2} \right )

for x=-1. Is it what you expected?

The parameter c will govern "how fast" your CDF climbs. Here is a graph of it between -1 and 1, for various values of c.

Ahhhh, yes. Not sure what I was thinking there.

So, I ought to get F(x) = (x+1)/2 + c/4(x^2 -1) for -1≤x≤1
=1 for x>1
=0 for x<-1

I believe I see what you were getting it (should not have taken so long). How does that look?
 
  • #11
Looks better to me :-)
 
  • #12
jfgobin said:
Looks better to me :-)

Great, thanks for the help, everyone!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K