Finding Critical Points and Local Extrema of a Multivariable Function

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on finding critical points and determining their nature for the function f(x,y) = x^2 + y^2 + 3xy. Initially, (0,0) was considered a local minimum, but the Hessian matrix's determinant, calculated as -5, indicates that this point is actually a saddle point. The transformation using new variables u and v reveals that the function has no extrema, confirming that (0,0) is the only critical point and is indeed a saddle point. The Jacobian of the transformation shows that it is a rotation and contraction of the original variables. Ultimately, the analysis concludes that the critical point at (0,0) is a saddle point, not a local minimum.
Black Orpheus
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
For f(x,y) = x^2 + y^2 + 3xy I need to find the critical points and prove whether or not they are local minima, maxima or saddle points. I thought the only critical point was (0,0) since Df = (2x + 3y, 2y + 3x) = 0. Doesn't this make (0,0) a local min? The reason I doubt this now is because upon constructing the Hessian matrix and finding the eigenvalues, I got lambda = 5 and -1 (which would show that the point is a saddle point). Can someone please help me with this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why are you finding the eigenvalues? What you want to do with the Hessian is find the determinant. The point is a local minimum.
 
For the problem I am also supposed to find the eigenvalues of the Hessian. Anyway, I think the Hessian is 2 3,3 2 (first row, second row) which makes the determinant 4-9 or -5. This means the det(Hf(x,y)) < 0, which makes the critical point a saddle (second derivative test for local extrema). Is it really a local min?
 
No, I am wrong, you are right. It's a saddle point.
 
Notice that f(x,y)=x^2 + y^2 + 3xy =(x+y)^2+xy

so apply the change of variables:

u=x+y, v=x-y

which has as its inverse

x=\frac{1}{2}(u+v),y=\frac{1}{2}(u-v)

to get

f\left( \frac{1}{2}(u+v), \frac{1}{2}(u-v)\right) =u^2+\frac{1}{4}(u+v)(u-v) = \frac{5}{4}u^2-\frac{1}{4}v^2

which clearly has no extrema (neither local nor global) and the only ciritical point is the saddle point u=v=0, this corresponds to x=y=0 which is likewise a saddle point for the Jacobian of the transformation is

J = \left| \frac{\partial (u,v)}{\partial (x,y)}\right| = \left| \begin{array}{cc} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}&amp;\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\\ \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}&amp;\frac{\partial v}{\partial y}\end{array}\right| = \left| \begin{array}{cc} 1&amp;1\\ 1&amp;-1\end{array}\right| = 1\cdot 1 - 1\cdot (-1) = 2

and the transformation is then just a rotation and a contraction of the old variables.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K