Finding dimensions of a rectangle.

Click For Summary
The problem involves finding the dimensions of a rectangle with a perimeter of 24 ft, where the length is 4 ft longer than the width. The width is represented as x, and the length as x + 4. The solution shows that by setting up the equation 2x + 2(x + 4) = 24, the width is calculated to be 4 ft and the length 8 ft. There is a discussion about different methods of solving the problem, emphasizing that any correct method is valid. Overall, the calculations confirm that the dimensions align with the given conditions of the rectangle.
rcmango
Messages
232
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



the perimeter of a rectangle is 24 ft. the length is 4 ft longer than the width find the dimensions

width x
length x+4

however, I should be doing it like this:

a first equation should start like: 2x+2y=?

and the second should start like x=y+?

so what's the length and the width?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



x + x + (x+4)+(x+4) = 24
4x+8=24
-8 -8

4x = 16
4x/4 = 16/4

x = 4

so width 4 ft
and length 4+4, so 8 ft.
makes sense, since length should be greater than width.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
x + x + (x+4)+(x+4) = 24

x = 4

exactly
 
rcmango said:

Homework Statement



the perimeter of a rectangle is 24 ft. the length is 4 ft longer than the width find the dimensions

width x
length x+4

however, I should be doing it like this:

a first equation should start like: 2x+2y=?

and the second should start like x=y+?

so what's the length and the width?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



x + x + (x+4)+(x+4) = 24
4x+8=24
-8 -8

4x = 16
4x/4 = 16/4

x = 4

so width 4 ft
and length 4+4, so 8 ft.
makes sense, since length should be greater than width.

Why do you say you "should be doing it like this:"? There is no *should*---any correct method is OK. Doing it two ways might be helpful towards learning goals, but it is not necessary for correct presentation of the solution.
 
If you've learned one way of solving problems of this kind, and you're expected to show that you have, in fact, understood the technique, then you probably should be doing just what you are, namely translating the facts bit by bit into equations, i.e.
  • "rectangle" suggests the equation 2x + 2y = 24
  • "width versus height" remark means y = x + 4
If you're just interested in the answer, any method will do, for instance this one, which I'll call "guess and revise":

Start with any width you like, say 7. Then the length will be 4 more, so 11. This gives you a perimeter of 7+7+11+11 = 36.

Oops, that's 12 too much. Let's subtract this "extra" length from the four sides, taking 12/4 = 3 away from each: width now is 7-3 = 4, and length is 11-3 = 8.
 
thankyou phinds for confirming.

Thanks for completing those equations Michael Redei, i seen them done that way and I didn't understand it, its much more clear now.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K