Finding displacement from the equilibrium

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the displacement from equilibrium in a Simple Harmonic Oscillator when the energy is divided into two-thirds kinetic energy (KE) and one-third potential energy (PE). Participants clarify the relevant equations for KE and PE, emphasizing the need to express total energy in terms of amplitude, A. The correct approach involves setting up the ratio of energies and solving for displacement using the potential energy formula. Ultimately, the correct displacement is derived from the relationship between total energy and potential energy, leading to the conclusion that the displacement can be calculated for any proportion of KE and PE.
tjohn101
Messages
92
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Give the following answer in terms of the amplitude, A. At what displacement from equilibrium is the energy of a Simple Harmonic Oscillator two-thirds KE and one-third PE?


Homework Equations


I would guess
PE=.5(k)(x)^2
KE=.5(m)(v)^2
E=.5(k)(x)^2 + .5(m)(v)^2
If one is 2/3, would I change the 1/2 in it's particular equation to 2/3? What would I do from there?

The Attempt at a Solution


So far I have no idea where to even begin.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

Let me see if I can lead you in the right direction. You've got a couple of formulas there for the kinetic energy and the potential energy-- these can be defined further for simple harmonic motion, since the functions x(t) and v(t) are known.

Once you have these formulas, which contain the amplitude, you can set the 2/3 / 1/3 ratio and find x.

Have a look at the wikipedia page-- specifically, scroll down to Dynamics of simple harmonic motion and then, most importantly, Energy of simple harmonic motion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_harmonic_motion"

Post again if you're still stuck. Good luck!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello and thank you for the answer!

Unfortunately, I'm still a bit stuck. There is an example in the book that is the exact same question but the energy is split 50/50 instead of 1/3 and 2/3. They got an answer of +/-.707.

How they got to that answer is completely beyond me.
 
I'm sorry, this problem is actually easier than I thought it was.

EDIT TO ADD: I just want to add, that by the above, I don't mean to imply that the problem is easy or hard or whatever. Only that you don't have to go into a whole lot of detail with the sin/cos stuff that I originally thought you did to arrive at the answer.

You have given the following equations in your first post:

U = \frac{1}{2}kx^2
K = \frac{1}{2}mv^2

E = U + K = \frac{1}{2}kx^2 + \frac{1}{2}mv^2

Now if only your total energy formula was expressed in a form that had the Amplitude, you would have an equation that you can use to determine x or v (since you know the ratio you want).

Fortunately, you can do just that, using the equations from the wiki page I mentioned. The important result, for you, is that:

E = U + K = \frac{1}{2}kx^2 + \frac{1}{2}mv^2 = \frac{1}{2}kA^2
 
Last edited:
Okay I understand that, but how do I turn the .5(k)(A)^2 into an answer?
 
I've given you the missing piece you need. What have you tried?

You have a formula for the potential energy. You have a formula for the total energy. You have a ratio of the total energy to the potential energy, for this particular problem.

How can you put it all together?

The reason I ask is that going any further will amount to basically giving you the answer.
 
Every time I do it I get 1/3*A... but that isn't right.
 
Displacement in a SHM is given by
x = Asinωt
Velocity will be
v = dx/dt = Aωcos(ωt) = ωsqrt(A^2 - x^2) ans E = 1/2*m*(A^2 - x^2)---(1)
Velocity is maximum when x = 0. So vmax = Aω and Emax = 1/2*m*vmax^2 = 1/2*m*ω^2*A^2 ----(2)
Ratio of E/Eamx is given. From equation 1and 2 find x.
 
Okay this time I ended up with x=1.5A

Sound anywhere near correct?
 
  • #10
E = 2/3*Emax
E/Emax = 2/3
(A^2 - x^2)/A^2 = 2/3
Solve for x.
 
  • #11
tjohn101 said:
Okay this time I ended up with x=1.5A

Sound anywhere near correct?

No. You should know this is incorrect physically. Why?

That said, rl.bhat's way is the complicated way to solve this. If you use the potential energy term, which is already in x^2, you don't need to calculate the velocity to get at x. For example, in the example you said where they want to know at what x the energy is split 50/50, you know 50% of the total energy is equal to the potential energy:

\frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{2}kA^2) = \frac{1}{2}kx^2

\rightarrow \frac{1}{2}A^2 = x^2

\rightarrow \frac{1}{\sqrt2}A = x

\rightarrow \pm .707A \simeq x

You can use this method for any proportion of U and K.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
797
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
766
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K