Finding Displacement through integration

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the displacement of a particle given its acceleration is inversely proportional to \((t+1)^3\). The particle starts from rest and has a known speed after a specific time interval.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration of acceleration to find velocity and then displacement. There is a focus on determining the correct constants of integration based on initial conditions.

Discussion Status

Some participants have identified potential errors in the integration process and the assignment of constants. There is acknowledgment of the need to revisit initial conditions to resolve discrepancies with the expected answer.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of initial conditions and the relationship between acceleration, velocity, and displacement. The discussion reflects confusion over the integration constants and their implications on the final displacement equation.

GregA
Messages
210
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble with the following question:

at any time t, the acceleration of a particle P, traveling in a straight line, is inversely proportional to (t+1)3. Initially, when t = 0, P is at rest at a point O, and 3 seconds later it has a speed 2ms-1. Find in terms of t the displacement of P from O at any time.

My working (using u = t+1):

[tex]a=\frac{k}{(t+1)^3}[/tex]
[tex]v=\int\frac{k}{(t+1)^3}dt[/tex] = [tex]\frac{-k}{2(t+1)^2}+C[/tex]

Now as the particle starts from rest at t= 0, C = 0, and when t =3, v = 2 such that

[tex]2 = \frac{-k}{2(3+1)^2}[/tex] and so K= -64 giving [tex]v = \frac{32}{(t+1)^2}[/tex]

I should now integrate this again to find s...
[tex]s=\int\frac{32}{(t+1)^2}dt[/tex] = [tex]\frac{32}{t+1}+C[/tex]
again, I can lose the constant because when t = 0 P is at the origin so that
[tex]s=\frac{32}{t+1}[/tex]

problem is...the books answer is [tex]s=\frac{32t^2}{15(t+1)}[/tex] and even worse...by differentiating this I find that v does indeed = 2 when t = 3. I am stumped as to how I should derive this though :frown: ... what am I doing wrong? :confused:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If v is given by

[tex]\frac{-k}{2(t+1)^2}+C[/tex]

and v = 0 at t = 0, then this would mean,

[tex]C = \frac{k}{2(0+1)^2} = \frac{k}{2}[/tex],

not that C = 0.

Then one needs the intial dispacement at t=0
 
agh...just kept overlooking that screw up in my working :redface: ...Thanks astronuc :smile:
 
I've done the same :biggrin:

Sometimes, one has to just walk away and not think about it, and that's usually when one has an "Aha!" moment. :cool:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K