Finding electric field at different points

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field at specific points along the x-axis due to two point charges: a negative charge at the origin and a positive charge located at 0.800 m. Participants are exploring the implications of charge interactions and the vector nature of electric fields.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the electric field formula and the importance of vector directions. There are attempts to clarify the contributions of each charge to the electric field at various points, particularly at 0.200 m and 1.20 m.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the vector nature of electric fields and the principle of superposition. There is ongoing clarification regarding the direction of the electric fields produced by the charges and how to properly sum them. Multiple interpretations of the problem setup are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are questioning the assumptions about the distances used in calculations and the definitions of electric field directions. There is a focus on understanding the relationship between the point of interest and the charges involved.

henchi03
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A point charge q1 = -6.00nC is at the origin, and a second point charge q2 = +4.00nC is on the x-axis at x = 0.800 m. Find the electric field at each of the following points on the x-axis; a.) 0.200m b.) x = 1.20m c.) x = -0.200 m

Homework Equations



E = kq1q2/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



i did a little research and saw this:

E = E1 + E2

so i did it. E1 = (9E9)(-6.00E-9)/(0.2)2 + E2 = (9E9)(+4.00E-9)/(0.6)2

= -1.350x103 + 1.00X102 = -1.25x103

but i my book the answer is -1.45X103

what am i doing wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi henchi03! welcome to pf! :smile:
henchi03 said:
E = kq1q2/r^2

so i did it. E1 = (9E9)(-6.00E-9)/(0.2)2 + E2 = (9E9)(+4.00E-9)/(0.6)2

technically, your E = kq1q2/r2 equation is a vector equation, not a scalar one

the direction of the vector is an essential part …

it is always outward if q1q2 is positive, and inward if q1q2 is negative

(the full vector version is E = kq1q2r/|r|3)

your r in E1 is the opposite direction from your r in E2, so your E2 should be negative :wink:
 
Henchi,

positive charges have E field lines pointing outwards from itself and negative charges have E field lines point inwards.

At point 0.2m, the E field due to Q1 and Q2 are both pointing left.

|E1|= 1350N/C
|E2|= 100N/C

Since both are pointing in the same direction they "reinforce" each other (principle of superposition of E-fields)

therefore you need to sum both E1 and E2 = 1450 and the direction is in the negative x axis.

Hope that helps.
 


tiny-tim said:
hi henchi03! welcome to pf! :smile:


technically, your E = kq1q2/r2 equation is a vector equation, not a scalar one

the direction of the vector is an essential part …

it is always outward if q1q2 is positive, and inward if q1q2 is negative

(the full vector version is E = kq1q2r/|r|3)

your r in E1 is the opposite direction from your r in E2, so your E2 should be negative :wink:

so i should use the vector version of the formula?

r is not the distance between q1 and q2? if it is, how could it be? coz the problem says E is at point 0.2m, it's in between the two charges...:confused:
 
yinx said:
Henchi,

positive charges have E field lines pointing outwards from itself and negative charges have E field lines point inwards.

At point 0.2m, the E field due to Q1 and Q2 are both pointing left.

|E1|= 1350N/C
|E2|= 100N/C

Since both are pointing in the same direction they "reinforce" each other (principle of superposition of E-fields)

therefore you need to sum both E1 and E2 = 1450 and the direction is in the negative x axis.

Hope that helps.

both pointing to the left? how?:confused:

0...0.2...0.8

q1...E...q2

isn't q1 pointing to the right?

aren't the charges suppose to be pointing towards E?
 
henchi03 said:
so i should use the vector version of the formula?

since everything is in a straight line, there's no point …

just remember that the direction (left or right) matters …

draw a little arrow on each of E1 and E2, to remind you which way they're pointing, before adding them …

E is really the x-component (Ex) of a vector E :wink:
r is not the distance between q1 and q2? if it is, how could it be? coz the problem says E is at point 0.2m, it's in between the two charges...:confused:

r is the distance between E and whichever charge we're looking at

q1 is a positive unit charge at E, and q2 is one of the other charges

(the positive charge is attracted by one of them, and repelled by the other, so of course both forces are in the same direction)

the standard formula uses q1 and q2, but you mustn't confuse that with any charges of the same name! :smile:
 
henchi03 said:
both pointing to the left? how?:confused:

0...0.2...0.8

q1...E...q2

isn't q1 pointing to the right?

aren't the charges suppose to be pointing towards E?

I think you are confused, E is not the point at 0.2m.
E means Electric field.

it should look something like this..
let point P be the point at 0.2m

Q1 (-ve) <------ (P) <------- Q2(+ve)

as mentioned, negative charge Q1 will have its own E-field lines pointing towards itself, the arrow left of (P) is the E-field line of Q1 and it is pointing towards Q1 right?

and for positive charge Q2, the field lines will be pointing away from it.. the arrow right of Q2 is the field line of Q2 and it is pointing away from Q2 right?

and if you notice, both arrows are pointed towards left, which means in this context it is pointed towards the -x direction.

therefore the magnitude of E is sum of E1 and E1, and the direction is -x direction (left).
 
ignore post
 
Last edited:
yinx said:
I think you are confused, E is not the point at 0.2m.
E means Electric field.

it should look something like this..
let point P be the point at 0.2m

Q1 (-ve) <------ (P) <------- Q2(+ve)

as mentioned, negative charge Q1 will have its own E-field lines pointing towards itself, the arrow left of (P) is the E-field line of Q1 and it is pointing towards Q1 right?

and for positive charge Q2, the field lines will be pointing away from it.. the arrow right of Q2 is the field line of Q2 and it is pointing away from Q2 right?

and if you notice, both arrows are pointed towards left, which means in this context it is pointed towards the -x direction.

therefore the magnitude of E is sum of E1 and E1, and the direction is -x direction (left).

okay last question, for letter b.) the point is at 1.20m

so where would the arrows' direction be?

is (-) charge ALWAYS pointing inwards? pointing to the charge itself? and (+) ALWAYS outwards? so it would be like this?

Q1(-ve)<------------Q2(+ve)------------->(P)

thus E1 = (-) and E2 = (+) ?

:confused:
 
  • #10
henchi03 said:
okay last question, for letter b.) the point is at 1.20m

so where would the arrows' direction be?

is (-) charge ALWAYS pointing inwards? pointing to the charge itself? and (+) ALWAYS outwards? so it would be like this?

Q1(-ve)<------------Q2(+ve)------------->(P)

thus E1 = (-) and E2 = (+) ?

:confused:

as you can see, in this case, the 2 E fields are "opposing" each other.
Find the magnitude of E1 and E2 and point p, take note which E field have greater magnitude.
minus them off, and the direction is in the direction of the Efield which have greater magnitude.

eg. if the (+ve) has greater mag, the direction is +X direction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K