Finding Electric Field due to hemispherical charge distribution

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field along the Z-axis due to a hemispherical charge distribution with radius R. The user attempts to derive the electric field using spherical coordinates and integrates the expression for electric field strength, ultimately arriving at the equation E = [(surface charge density)*(R)^2]/[2*epsilon*(R-z)^2]. However, the user encounters a divide by zero error when trying to find the potential difference between the origin and a point on the Z-axis. The conversation highlights the need for a correct approach to integrate the electric field and potential for this specific geometry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and potentials in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates and integration techniques
  • Knowledge of surface charge density and its implications
  • Basic principles of charge distributions and their effects on electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of electric fields from charge distributions using integration techniques
  • Study the electric field produced by a ring of charge and its application to hemispherical distributions
  • Learn about potential energy in electrostatics and how to avoid singularities in calculations
  • Explore numerical methods for evaluating integrals in electrostatics when analytical solutions are complex
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, particularly those studying electromagnetism, as well as educators and researchers interested in charge distributions and electric field calculations.

S[e^x]=f(u)^n
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to find the electric field along the Z-axis for a hemispherical open shell of radius R (open face down). the shell is oriented so its symmetrical about the Z axis.


The Attempt at a Solution


What I've done is set it up, taken the vector from the origin (at the center of what would be the full sphere), and subtracted the vector bound to the z axis, to get the vector from the differential surface of the shell to an arbitrary point on the z axis. I then integrate, using spherical coordinates the 1/r^2 expression...

I can't seem to get this to work, can someone guide me through the right steps?, I've been trying to do this for about 7hrs now, and feel really stupid since I'm a 3rd year uni student majoring in physics...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
consider any thin circular strip on hemisphere at angle θ from vertical and subtending angle dθ on center.

find field due to this just like you do for ring on axis
then integrate it from θ = 0 to 90 degree
 
I've tried that, and i end up with E= [(surface charge density)*(R)^2]/[2*epsilon*(R-z)^2]

where R is the hemispheres radius, and z, is a point on the z axis...

i then integrate this to find the potential between R (along the z axis), and the origin, which ends up in a divide by 0 error... so i know the Electric field equation cannot be right although it seems to check out dimensionally...

is there an easier way to find the potential between the origin and R(on the z axis) that I'm missing? right now I'm just going after the electric field, which should then lead to a simple integration to get the potential difference between the two points. or have i forgotten something?
 
S[e^x]=f(u)^n;3119613 said:
I've tried that, and i end up with E= [(surface charge density)*(R)^2]/[2*epsilon*(R-z)^2]

where R is the hemispheres radius, and z, is a point on the z axis...

Perhaps you could show how you arrived at that? The well-known result for the on-axis field produced by a ring of charge Q of radius a and distance x is given by:

E_x = \frac{{kQx}}{{\left( {x^2 + a^2 } \right)^{{3 \mathord{\left/<br /> {\vphantom {3 2}} \right.<br /> \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}} }}
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
929
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
826
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
951
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K