Finding energy in a 4 object charge system

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential energy in a system of four charged objects, specifically focusing on the movement of a charge from one position to another. The charges involved are +2.0×10−5 C, +10.0×10−5 C, and -20.0×10−5 C, with participants attempting to find the total energy of the system based on their interactions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss calculating the initial potential electric energy for each pair of charged objects and summing these values. There are attempts to identify missing pairs in the calculations and to clarify the importance of including charge signs in the energy equations. Some participants question the accuracy of the calculations and the assumptions made regarding the interactions between the charges.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on the importance of including negative signs in calculations and identifying potential errors in numerical values. There is no explicit consensus on the correct approach yet, as participants are still exploring different interpretations and calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the system consists of four charges, and there is a concern about the accuracy of the calculations due to the complexity of interactions and the necessity of considering charge signs. Some participants are unable to access their previous work, which may hinder the discussion.

Anthony Santelices
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An object with charge +2.0×10−5 C is moved from position C to position D in the figure (Figure 1) . q1 = q3 = +10.0×10−5 C and q2 = −20.0×10−5 C. All four charged objects are the system.

Here's a picture to the problem
upload_2016-3-28_18-27-18.png

Homework Equations


$$ F = \frac {kq_1 q_2}{r^2} $$
$$ U_e = \frac {kq_1 q_2}{r} $$
$$ a^2+b^2=c^2 $$

The Attempt at a Solution


I first attempted finding all the energy for the system by finding the initial potential electric energy for each pair of charged objects and added them together. I managed to find the distance from ## q_2 ## to ## q_1## and ##q_3## using Pythagorean theorem.$$ c → q_1, c → q_2, c → q_3, q_2 → q_1, q_2 → q_3 $$
Unfortunately after putting the added energies it came up as wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Anthony, :welcome:

I suspect something went wrong with your calculations, can you show them, please ?
Note that 'the system' consists of four charges!
 
This is the picture :

upload_2016-3-29_0-26-6.png

Anthony Santelices said:

Homework Statement


An object with charge +2.0×10−5 C is moved from position C to position D in the figure (Figure 1) . q1 = q3 = +10.0×10−5 C and q2 = −20.0×10−5 C. All four charged objects are the system.

Here's a picture to the problem

Homework Equations


$$ F = \frac {kq_1 q_2}{r^2} $$
$$ U_e = \frac {kq_1 q_2}{r} $$
$$ a^2+b^2=c^2 $$

The Attempt at a Solution


I first attempted finding all the energy for the system by finding the initial potential electric energy for each pair of charged objects and added them together. I managed to find the distance from ## q_2 ## to ## q_1## and ##q_3## using Pythagorean theorem.$$ c → q_1, c → q_2, c → q_3, q_2 → q_1, q_2 → q_3 $$
Unfortunately after putting the added energies it came up as wrong.
Have you left out the pair q1-q3?
 
ehild said:
This is the picture :

View attachment 98121

Have you left out the pair q1-q3?
Ah yes! It appears I did. However, even without having it I was getting 126 J. It says that the answer is -105 J. So that tells me I messed up somewhere while calculating with all the ##U_e##'s.
BvU said:
Hello Anthony, :welcome:

I suspect something went wrong with your calculations, can you show them, please ?
Note that 'the system' consists of four charges!
I don't have access to my work atm as I am not home. I will make sure to post it as soon I get the chance!
 
BvU said:
Hello Anthony, :welcome:

I suspect something went wrong with your calculations, can you show them, please ?
Note that 'the system' consists of four charges!
These are the numbers I got along with the added ##q_1, q_3##
$$ U_{c,q1} = \frac {(9*10^9)(+2.0*10^{-5}) (+10.0*10^{-5})} {2.0} = 9\ J$$
$$ U_{c,q2} = \frac {(9*10^9)(+2.0*10^{-5}) (-20.0*10^{-5})} {2.0} = 18\ J$$
$$ U_{c,q3} = \frac {(9*10^9)(+2.0*10^{-5}) (+10.0*10^{-5})} {2.0} = 9\ J$$
$$ U_{q2,q1} = \frac {(9*10^9)(-20.0*10^{-5}) (+10.0*10^{-5})} {2\sqrt2} = 45\ J$$
$$ U_{q2,q3} = \frac {(9*10^9)(-20.0*10^{-5}) (+10.0*10^{-5})} {2\sqrt2} = 45\ J$$
$$ U_{q1,q3} = \frac {(9*10^9)(+10.0*10^{-5}) (+10.0*10^{-5})} {4.0} = 22.5\ J$$
 
You ignored all the negative signs.
 
ehild said:
You ignored all the negative signs.
I've tried it with the negative signs, but I end up getting -68. The correct answer shown was -105, so I don't know exactly where I went wrong.
 
You must include the signs of the charges,
And even the numerical values of U(q2,q1) and U(q2,q3) are wrong.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K