Finding Energy in FCC Lattice Using Weak Potential Method

mcas
Messages
22
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Find the energy of an electron in a FCC lattice using the weak potential method.
Relevant Equations
\[(E^0_{(k+G)}+V_0-E_k)u_G(k) + \sum_{G'\ne G}u_{G'}(k)=0\]
I have a problem with finding the energy of an electron in an FCC lattice using the weak potential method. We did that for a one-dimensional lattice during class, and I know that there was a double degeneration at the boundaries of the first Brillouin Zone. However, I'm not sure what degeneration there is in the FCC lattice. I think 8 but that would mean I would have to find a determiner of a 8x8 matrix and then solve an 8th degree equation in order to find the energy which is kind of a scary thing to do.
So, how to find the energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What degeneration does the FCC lattice have?The degeneracy of the FCC lattice is 12. You can calculate this by counting the number of distinct points in the first Brillouin zone (12). To find the energy, you will need to solve a 12th-degree equation, but there is a simpler way to do this. By taking advantage of the symmetry of the lattice, it is possible to simplify the equation to an 8th-degree equation. This is done by splitting the lattice into two sublattices and decoupling the equations for each sublattice. This is known as the 'decoupling approximation' and is a common method for solving weak potential problems.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top