Finding Finite Series for Euler's Number (e)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eddybob123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Construction
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
eddybob123
Messages
177
Reaction score
0
well, i kno that e is derived from (1+(1/n))^n, as n goes to infinity, but i want to find a finite series . if i plot a curve like this on a graph, then take its derivative, i can tske a value of e.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eddybob123 said:
well, i kno that e is derived from (1+(1/n))^n, as n goes to infinity, but i want to find a finite series . if i plot a curve like this on a graph, then take its derivative, i can tske a value of e.

A "finite series"? What do you mean? If you meant an infinite series a common one is [itex]e = \frac{1}{0!}+\frac{1}{1!}+\frac{1}{2!}+\frac{1}{3!}+...[/itex]. In fact e^x is sometimes defined as
[tex]\frac{1}{0!}+\frac{x}{1!}+\frac{x^2}{2!}+\frac{x^3}{3!}+...[/tex]
 
Another useful definition of e, especially for calc I derivation of the e^x rule, is [tex]lim_{n \to 0} (1+n)^{1/n}[/tex].

[tex]\frac{d}{dx}e^x=lim_{h \to 0} \frac{e^{x+h}-e^x}{h}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{d}{dx}e^x=e^xlim_{h \to 0} \frac{e^h-1}{h}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{d}{dx}e^x=e^xlim_{h \to 0} \frac{\left(\left(1+h\right)^{1/h}\right)^h-1}{h}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{d}{dx}e^x=e^xlim_{h \to 0} \frac{1+h-1}{h}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{d}{dx}e^x=e^x[/tex]
 
eddybob123 said:
well, i kno that e is derived from (1+(1/n))^n, as n goes to infinity, but i want to find a finite series . if i plot a curve like this on a graph, then take its derivative, i can tske a value of e.
Any finite series, involving only integers and fractions of integers, must give a rational number. e is not rational so there can be no such finite series. In fact, because e is transcendental, any such series would have to involve transcendental numbers as coefficients which would be as difficult to work with as e itself.