Finding g from Atwood's Machine

  • Thread starter Thread starter jessicak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Machine
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 5K views
jessicak
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
1.Homework Statement

Two masses hang from a string running over a pulley. Such a device can be used to measure the acceleration of gravity; it is then called Atwood's machine. If the masses are nearly equal, then the a of the masses will be much smaller than g; than makes it convienient to measure a and then calculate g. Suppose than an experimenter using masses m1= 450g and m2=452g finds that the masses move a distance of 0.472m in 5.8s starting from rest. What value of g does this imply? Assume the pulley is massless.



Homework Equations


I know that a=(m2-m1/(m2+m1))g




The Attempt at a Solution


From the above equation, I know that a=0.0022g
When using a=2y/t2, though I get g=12.8m/s/s, which is wrong (online hw).
Can anyone point me in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jessicak said:
1.Homework Statement

Two masses hang from a string running over a pulley. Such a device can be used to measure the acceleration of gravity; it is then called Atwood's machine. If the masses are nearly equal, then the a of the masses will be much smaller than g; than makes it convienient to measure a and then calculate g. Suppose than an experimenter using masses m1= 450g and m2=452g finds that the masses move a distance of 0.472m in 5.8s starting from rest. What value of g does this imply? Assume the pulley is massless.



Homework Equations


I know that a=(m2-m1/(m2+m1))g
yes, but you should derive that equation instead of looking it up.

The Attempt at a Solution


From the above equation, I know that a=0.0022g
When using a=2y/t2, though I get g=12.8m/s/s, which is wrong (online hw).
Can anyone point me in the right direction?
I get g=12.6, which probably in either case should be rounded to 2 significant figures, g=13m/s/s.. Looks like there was a lot of experimental error in that setup.