Finding general solution to a differential equation using power series

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the general solution to the differential equation y'' - xy' + 2y = 0 using power series near x = 0. The proposed solution involves two series, y_1(x) = 1 - x^2 and y_2(x) = x - 1/6 * x^3 - 1/120 * x^5 - 1/1680 * x^7, with coefficients needing clarification. Participants highlight mistakes in the initial attempt, particularly regarding the recurrence relation for coefficients and the incorrect assumption of a closed form involving e^x. The conversation emphasizes the importance of identifying patterns in the series and suggests focusing on writing out more terms to discern relationships among coefficients. Overall, the thread underscores the complexity of deriving explicit solutions in power series form for this differential equation.
s3a
Messages
828
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


Find the general solution near x = 0 of y'' - xy' + 2y = 0 (using power series).

Answer:
y = a_0 * y_1(x) + a_1 * y_2(x)
where
y_1(x) = 1 - x^2 and y_2(x) = x - 1/6 * x^3 - 1/120 x^5 - 1/1680 * x^7 - ...


Homework Equations


Power series. Sigma notation for summations. Polynomial derivatives.


The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt is attached. I get y(x) = ke^x and I think I'm wrong but I'm not sure since the answer my book gives doesn't use sigma notation.

I'd appreciate if someone could tell me if I'm right or wrong and if I am wrong, where I went wrong.
Thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

  • MyWork.jpg
    MyWork.jpg
    70.4 KB · Views: 1,424
Physics news on Phys.org
I see two mistakes. First, the non-zero an of the second solution aren't given by -a1/n! for n>1. Second, even if that were the case, your solution wouldn't be ex because the sign of the first term the series is wrong.

Try calculating a7 explicitly using the recurrence relation.
 
I get a_7 = 1/14 * a_5 = 1/14 * -1/120 * a_1 = -1/1680 * a_1 and I see that the a_n = -1/n! a_1 does not work out for that particular case.

I also see that a_n = -1/n! does not hold for the zero values.

As for the sign of the first term for the e^x part, I didn't understand what you meant. Could you rephrase that please?

I would appreciate it if you could tell me what the explicit relationship is and what the reasoning was in order to get it because my book doesn't cover the material in this way and uses another method which I dislike (the no summation notation, "dot dot dot" method).
 
I see more mistakes now that I'm awake. They're easy to see if you just compare the two series. Your solution was
$$y_2(x) = a_1\left(x - \frac{x^3}{6} - \frac{x^5}{120} - \frac{x^7}{1680} - \cdots\right)$$ but
$$-a_1 e^x = a_1\left(-1 - x - \frac{x^2}{2} - \frac{x^3}{6} - \cdots \right)$$ What I meant about the sign of the "first" term was the sign of the linear term.
 
Okay, I also redid my work from scratch with neater handwriting and computed up to the a_9 term but I still can't figure out how to get an explicit equation. Namely, how would I take into account that there are zeros for every even subscript from a_4 onward?

I'm currently thinking of something like a_n = [(-1)^n - 1]/2 * 3/n! which works for a_7 and a_9 but not for a_5. I'm still really stuck :(.
 

Attachments

  • MyWork.jpg
    MyWork.jpg
    79.1 KB · Views: 1,222
Why are you insisting on having a closed form expression? Sometimes it's not really possible. Just try writing out more terms and see if you can spot a pattern. It usually doesn't help to simplify as you go because you're looking for a pattern.

Anyway, to get only odd powers, you typically write something like
$$\sin x = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{x^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!}$$
 
Last edited:
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K