Finding Geometry of Near-Extremal D3 Brane | Schwarzschild in 5D

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pacopag
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Schwarzschild
Pacopag
Messages
193
Reaction score
4
Hi;
I am trying to find the geometry of a near-extremal D3 brane. I have been told that this geometry is the same as the 5D analog to the Schwarzschild metric with a negative cosmological constant. Trying to mimic Schutz (Ch 10) I tried plugging the metric
ds^2=e^{2\eta}dq^2-e^{2\zeta}dt^2+e^{2\xi}dr^2+r^{2}d\Omega^2
into the Einstein field equations with T_{a b}=0, to solve for the functions \eta,\zeta,\xi, which I am assuming are functions of r only. The coordinate q is for the extra dimension. The system of DEs I get from this are terrible.

Anyway, I'm not expecting anyone to solve this problem for me. I am almost certain that this calculation has been done before, so I am wondering if anyone knows of any references that might help me out, or if someone could maybe tell me if I am going about this problem the right way. Please keep in mind that my main goal is to get a handle on the near-extremal D3 brane geometry.

Note: I don't really know anything about string theory, so please try not to use to much of its language, or else please define any string theory jargon that you may use. Also, I have to go shovel some snow, so I may not be online to reply for an hour or so.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Great. Thanks George. That looks like the track that I want to get on.

Cheers.
 
Do you have software to solve the equations? That can make things easier.
Also, wouldn't the variables be a function of t?
 
I have maple with grtensor. I asked maple to solve the system, but it doesn't really give me anything useful. As for the functions of t: that may very well be the case, but I am looking for the static solution, so I am just naively assuming that the metric components are t-independent.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top