Finding Integer Sided Isosceles Triangles with Perimeter 2008

  • Thread starter Thread starter ritwik06
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the number of integer-sided isosceles obtuse angle triangles with a perimeter of 2008. Participants explore the relationships between the sides of the triangle and the angles involved, particularly focusing on the obtuse angle and its implications for the triangle's dimensions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to derive relationships between the sides using trigonometric identities and the cosine rule. There are discussions about the implications of the obtuse angle on the side lengths and the perimeter. Some participants question the logic behind certain assumptions and calculations, particularly regarding the sine and cosecant functions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various approaches being explored. Some participants have offered alternative methods for deriving inequalities related to the side lengths, while others are questioning the validity of specific steps taken in the reasoning process. There is no explicit consensus on the existence of such triangles, but several lines of reasoning are being examined.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of integer solutions and the constraints imposed by the triangle inequality and the properties of obtuse triangles. There are also mentions of potential errors in earlier calculations that may affect the conclusions drawn.

ritwik06
Messages
577
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the number of of all integer sided isosceles obtuse angle triangles with perimeter 2008.

The Attempt at a Solution


I assumed the obtuse angle as 90+2a
Let the length of the equal sides be L an that of the base = 2X
2(L+x)=1004

Draw the perpendicular to the side opposite to the obtuse angle from the opposite vertex.
It will divide the triangle into congruent parts. Using sine rule in one of the to triangles formed.
I get
sin (45+a)/X=1/L
sin (45+a)/X=1/(1004-X)


X=1004/ (cosec (45+a)+1)
0<a<45

2<cosec (45+a)+1<2.4142

as 2X is an integer

cosec (45+a)+1 should be an integer and a factor of 1004 which is not possible. Therefore, no such triangle is possible!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ritwik06 said:

Homework Statement


Find the number of of all integer sided isosceles obtuse angle triangles with perimeter 2008.

The Attempt at a Solution


I assumed the obtuse angle as 90+2a
Let the length of the equal sides be L an that of the base = 2X
2(L+x)=1004
You're given that the perimeter is 2008, not 1004, so the equation should be
2L + 2X = 2008, or 2(L + X) = 2008, from which you get L + X = 1004
ritwik06 said:
Draw the perpendicular to the side opposite to the obtuse angle from the opposite vertex.
It will divide the triangle into congruent parts. Using sine rule in one of the to triangles formed.
I get
sin (45+a)/X=1/L

It's much simpler as sin(45 + a) = X/L
Replacing L by 1004 - X, this becomes
sin(45 + a) = X/(1004 - X)
ritwik06 said:
sin (45+a)/X=1/(1004-X)


X=1004/ (cosec (45+a)+1)
0<a<45

2<cosec (45+a)+1<2.4142
I don't follow your logic here. It looks like it comes from 1 < csc(45 + a) < sqrt(2), but you'll have to explain why that is true. (It might be, but I don't see it.)

Also, you can't replace 1 + sqrt(2) with 2.4142; they are only approximately equal.
ritwik06 said:
as 2X is an integer

cosec (45+a)+1 should be an integer and a factor of 1004 which is not possible. Therefore, no such triangle is possible!
 
The obtuse angle alpha must indeed be the angle between the equal sides L. Let the side opposite to alpha ideed be 2x. Use of the cosine rule gives
4*x^2=L^2+L^2 -2L^2*cos(alpha).
So cos(alpha)=1-2*x^2/L^2. Because the angle is obtuse cos(alpha)<0 so to solve is:
1-2*x^2/L^2<0, multiply by L^2, since L^2 >0 this gives L^2-2*x^2<0, or L^2<2*x^2,
L<xSqrt(2)=(1004-L)sqrt(2), L(1+sqrt(2))<1004, L<1004/(1+sqrt(2).
The number of solutions are: int(1004/(1+sqrt(2).
greetings
 
Made an error L has to be greater than x!
 
Just so you know, there is another way that I might prefer to get to the point where L^2<2*x^2. If you remember our Pythagorean Theorem for right triangles:
a^{2} + b^{2} = c^{2}
You might also know that for obtuse triangles:
a^{2} + b^{2} &lt; c^{2}
Because you chose L for the legs, a and b, and 2x for the largest side, the one opposite alpha or c.
L^{2} + L^{2} &lt; (2x)^{2}
or
2L^{2} &lt; 4x^{2}
therefore
L^{2} &lt; 2x^{2}
I like this way, and showing it two ways means it's probably right.
 
Chaos2009 said:
therefore
L^{2} &lt; 2x^{2}
I like this way, and showing it two ways means it's probably right.

Ok so x<L<sqrt(2)*x, and how many solutions are there?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
9K