Finding inverse of a matrix and solving given equations.

  • Thread starter Thread starter cmcc3119
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Matrix
Click For Summary
To find the inverse of the matrix A and solve the given systems of equations, one must first recognize that the equations can be represented in matrix form as Ax = b. The inverse of matrix A is calculated as A^-1, which allows for the equation to be rearranged to x = A^-1b. This method provides the values of x1, x2, and x3 directly from the multiplication of A^-1 with the vector b. Understanding this principle simplifies the process of solving linear equations using matrix algebra. The discussion highlights the importance of matrix inverses in solving systems of equations efficiently.
cmcc3119
Messages
16
Reaction score
2
[SOLVED] Finding inverse of a matrix and solving given equations.

Hi,

I have a quiz tomorrow and I am looking at the sample quiz right now but I don't understand how the answers work!

Here is the question:

Find the inverse of the matrix A=

-1 3 3
-2 1 2
0 1 1

Hence solve the following systems of equations:

-x1 + 3x2 + 3x3 = 5
-2x1 + x2 + 2x3 = 2
x2 + x3 = 1

and

-x + 3z = -5
2x - y - 4z = 2
-2x + y + 5z = -1The answer says the inverse of A
-1 0 3
2 -1 -4
-2 1 5

Then it spells out how to solve the equations but the is the part that confuses me:

"The first system of equations corresponds to the matrix equation A
[x1 = [5
x2 = 2
x3 ] = 1]

Therefore, as A is invertible (i.e. A-1 exists),

[x1
x2
x3]

=A inverse of

[5
2
1]

which =

[-1 0 3 [5 [-2
2 -1 -4 2 = 4
-2 1 5 ] 1] -3 ]

So x1 = -2, x2 = 4, x3 = -3.

Can someone please explain how they just did that because I really can't understand where they derive -2, 4 , 3 from and what they do with [5, 2 ,1]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So you've got this matrix \left(\begin{array}{ccc} -1 &amp; 3 &amp; 3 \\<br /> -2&amp;1&amp;2 \\<br /> 0&amp;1&amp;1 <br /> \end{array}\right) and you set of equations.

The first thing to note is that your equations are equal to \left(\begin{array}{ccc} -1 &amp; 3 &amp; 3 \\-2&amp;1&amp;2 \\ 0&amp;1&amp;1 \end{array}\right) \left(\begin{array}{c}x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}5\\2\\1\end{array}\right).

So, in order to find (x1,x2,x3)T you need to multiply the equation on the left by the inverse of A. This will give (x1,x2,x3)T= something.. where you can calculate the "something" by matrix algebra.
 
So how would I know that I have to multiply the left by the inverse of A to find the answer? Is there some basic principle or law that I am unaware of?
 
Well, yes. The easiest way to solve the equation Ax=b (for a matrix A and vectors x and b) is to try and get x on it's own, no? Now, you know that AA^{-1}=A^{-1}A=I, so you know that multiplying the equation by A inverse will leave you with x=A^{-1}b, from which you can read off values for x.
 
Its so hard to put all these number and boxes back into simple ax = b and again rearrange. Thanks cristo for your help!
 
No worries
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K