# Finding limit with two unknown numbers

• cataschok
In summary, the homework statement is trying to find two numbers such that the limit of their product is one. The first part looks good, but the second part is unclear. The problem may be with the square-root, which is outside of the equation. If b=4, the numerator and denominator both go to zero, and the limit is one.

## Homework Statement

Find numbers a and b such that lim x$\rightarrow0$ [$\sqrt{}(ax+b)$ - 2] / x = 1

## The Attempt at a Solution

so far, I've gotten to ax+b = (x+2)^2
... lim ax+b - lim (x+2)^2 = 0
...b - lim (x+2)^2 = 0
...b = 2^2
...b = 4

If i try to place b=4 back into the original equation, a will always end up as 0. I also can't find a way to extract a first.. So I'm stuck and I can't sleep at night.

This questions is supposed to "test our understandings of the material"... but I really can't understand much where each chapter is covered in a 1 hour lecture.

It's supposed to test your understanding... this is my personal bugbear so:

What does the concept of a "limit" mean?

$$\lim_{x \rightarrow 0} \frac{\sqrt{\left ( ax + b \right )} -2}{x} = 1$$

I can't tell if the -2 is inside the sqare root or not. Suspect outside from what you wrote after.

The first part looks good.
If you put b=4 into the original expression for the limit, you'll find the numerator and the denominator are both zero when x=0, which is what you need. But 0/0 is not always 1. So what is the other condition that ensures that the quotient is 1 in the limit?

Last edited:
yes the equation that you wrote is correct

from what i got in the book, it says when both the numerator and denominator approaches zero, the best way to go at it would be to simplify the the quotient.

So I multiplied top and bottom with $\sqrt{}(ax+b)$ + 2

the numerator will eventually become ax+2 if i replace b with 4.
then if i take the limit of x->0, the result will be 2/4... so a = 1/2?? First, since the denominator clearly goes to 0, in order that the limit exist at all, the numerator must also go to 0: setting x= 0 in the numerator, you must have $\sqrt{b}- 2= 0$. That tells you what b is. Now, what is a so that the limit is, in fact, 1?

(Your last sentence, "if i take the limit of x->0, the result will be 2/4... so a = 1/2??" makes no sense. What result? The "result" should either be 1 or involve a- setting those two equal should tell you what a must be.)

I suspect the solution is in a temporary blind-spot, so it will probably not be guessed.
I don't want to just tell you ... so, I'll try another hint: I get a = 4, but how??[*]

In order for the limit to be one, the limit of the numerator must be the same as the limit of the denominator ... you got that part all right. But also, the numerator and the denominator must approach the limit at the same rate.

f=mx/nx has a limit at the origin of m/n, yes, because the x's cancel, but even without that because they approach 0 at different rates. The rate of approaching a limit is the understanding that was being tested.

Now - how would you find that out?

--------------------------------
What you did:
So I multiplied top and bottom with $\sqrt{(ax+b)}+2$
presumably hoping to get rid of the square-root [I tidied up your TeX]... but that just gives you:

$$\lim_{x\rightarrow0} \frac{ax+b-4}{x\sqrt{ax+b}}=1$$

I figure you reasoned like this:
putting b=4 let's you cancel the x's (bonus!):
$$\lim_{x\rightarrow0} \frac{a}{\sqrt{ax+4}}=1$$

in the limit, this becomes:
$$\frac{a}{\sqrt{4}} = 1 \Rightarrow a=2$$

... but if you put $y=\frac{\sqrt{2x+4}-2}{x}$ and plot (x,y), the curve approaches (0,0.5) instead of (0,1). So it cannot be right!

So what went wrong?

\sqrt{}(ax+b) +2

but it is clearer if it is
\sqrt{(ax+b)} + 2

LaTeX is so worth learning.

[*] I have been known to make silly arithmetic errors, sometimes on purpose, so don't take this as gospel.

Last edited:
I'm approaching 0 solutions atm. lol but I had a last try

$\sqrt{(ax+b)} - 2$ = x
... $\sqrt{(ax+b)}$ = x + 2
ax + 4 = (x+2)^2
ax + 4 = x^2 + 4x + 4
ax = x ( x + 4 )
cancel out the x's

a = x+ 4
if lim x->0, a = 4

well that worked :) just by direct cancellation.